What is the right approach when using STL container for median calculation?

Let's say I need to retrieve the median from a sequence of 1000000 random numeric values.

If using anything but std::list, I have no (built-in) way to sort sequence for median calculation.

If using std::list, I can't randomly access values to retrieve middle (median) of sorted sequence.

Is it better to implement sorting myself and go with e.g. std::vector, or is it better to use std::list and use std::list::iterator to for-loop-walk to the median value? The latter seems less overheadish, but also feels more ugly..

Or are there more and better alternatives for m开发者_高级运维e?

Any random-access container (like std::vector) can be sorted with the standard std::sort algorithm, available in the <algorithm> header.

For finding the median, it would be quicker to use std::nth_element; this does enough of a sort to put one chosen element in the correct position, but doesn't completely sort the container. So you could find the median like this:

int median(vector<int> &v)
{
    size_t n = v.size() / 2;
    nth_element(v.begin(), v.begin()+n, v.end());
    return v[n];
}

The median is more complex than Mike Seymour's answer. The median differs depending on whether there are an even or an odd number of items in the sample. If there are an even number of items, the median is the average of the middle two items. This means that the median of a list of integers can be a fraction. Finally, the median of an empty list is undefined. Here is code that passes my basic test cases:

///Represents the exception for taking the median of an empty list
class median_of_empty_list_exception:public std::exception{
  virtual const char* what() const throw() {
    return "Attempt to take the median of an empty list of numbers.  "
      "The median of an empty list is undefined.";
  }
};

///Return the median of a sequence of numbers defined by the random
///access iterators begin and end.  The sequence must not be empty
///(median is undefined for an empty set).
///
///The numbers must be convertible to double.
template<class RandAccessIter>
double median(RandAccessIter begin, RandAccessIter end) 
  if(begin == end){ throw median_of_empty_list_exception(); }
  std::size_t size = end - begin;
  std::size_t middleIdx = size/2;
  RandAccessIter target = begin + middleIdx;
  std::nth_element(begin, target, end);

  if(size % 2 != 0){ //Odd number of elements
    return *target;
  }else{            //Even number of elements
    double a = *target;
    RandAccessIter targetNeighbor= target-1;
    std::nth_element(begin, targetNeighbor, end);
    return (a+*targetNeighbor)/2.0;
  }
}

This algorithm handles both even and odd sized inputs efficiently using the STL nth_element (amortized O(N)) algorithm and the max_element algorithm (O(n)). Note that nth_element has another guaranteed side effect, namely that all of the elements before n are all guaranteed to be less than v[n], just not necessarily sorted.

//post-condition: After returning, the elements in v may be reordered and the resulting order is implementation defined.
double median(vector<double> &v)
{
  if(v.empty()) {
    return 0.0;
  }
  auto n = v.size() / 2;
  nth_element(v.begin(), v.begin()+n, v.end());
  auto med = v[n];
  if(!(v.size() & 1)) { //If the set size is even
    auto max_it = max_element(v.begin(), v.begin()+n);
    med = (*max_it + med) / 2.0;
  }
  return med;    
}

Here's a more complete version of Mike Seymour's answer:

// Could use pass by copy to avoid changing vector
double median(std::vector<int> &v)
{
  size_t n = v.size() / 2;
  std::nth_element(v.begin(), v.begin()+n, v.end());
  int vn = v[n];
  if(v.size()%2 == 1)
  {
    return vn;
  }else
  {
    std::nth_element(v.begin(), v.begin()+n-1, v.end());
    return 0.5*(vn+v[n-1]);
  }
}

It handles odd- or even-length input.

putting together all the insights from this thread I ended up having this routine. it works with any stl-container or any class providing input iterators and handles odd- and even-sized containers. It also does its work on a copy of the container, to not modify the original content.

template <typename T = double, typename C>
inline const T median(const C &the_container)
{
    std::vector<T> tmp_array(std::begin(the_container), 
                             std::end(the_container));
    size_t n = tmp_array.size() / 2;
    std::nth_element(tmp_array.begin(), tmp_array.begin() + n, tmp_array.end());

    if(tmp_array.size() % 2){ return tmp_array[n]; }
    else
    {
        // even sized vector -> average the two middle values
        auto max_it = std::max_element(tmp_array.begin(), tmp_array.begin() + n);
        return (*max_it + tmp_array[n]) / 2.0;
    }
}

You can sort an std::vector using the library function std::sort.

std::vector<int> vec;
// ... fill vector with stuff
std::sort(vec.begin(), vec.end());

There exists a linear-time selection algorithm. The below code only works when the container has a random-access iterator, but it can be modified to work without — you'll just have to be a bit more careful to avoid shortcuts like end - begin and iter + n.

#include <algorithm>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
#include <vector>

template<class A, class C = std::less<typename A::value_type> >
class LinearTimeSelect {
public:
    LinearTimeSelect(const A &things) : things(things) {}
    typename A::value_type nth(int n) {
        return nth(n, things.begin(), things.end());
    }
private:
    static typename A::value_type nth(int n,
            typename A::iterator begin, typename A::iterator end) {
        int size = end - begin;
        if (size <= 5) {
            std::sort(begin, end, C());
            return begin[n];
        }
        typename A::iterator walk(begin), skip(begin);
#ifdef RANDOM // randomized algorithm, average linear-time
        typename A::value_type pivot = begin[std::rand() % size];
#else // guaranteed linear-time, but usually slower in practice
        while (end - skip >= 5) {
            std::sort(skip, skip + 5);
            std::iter_swap(walk++, skip + 2);
            skip += 5;
        }
        while (skip != end) std::iter_swap(walk++, skip++);
        typename A::value_type pivot = nth((walk - begin) / 2, begin, walk);
#endif
        for (walk = skip = begin, size = 0; skip != end; ++skip)
            if (C()(*skip, pivot)) std::iter_swap(walk++, skip), ++size;
        if (size <= n) return nth(n - size, walk, end);
        else return nth(n, begin, walk);
    }
    A things;
};

int main(int argc, char **argv) {
    std::vector<int> seq;
    {
        int i = 32;
        std::istringstream(argc > 1 ? argv[1] : "") >> i;
        while (i--) seq.push_back(i);
    }
    std::random_shuffle(seq.begin(), seq.end());
    std::cout << "unordered: ";
    for (std::vector<int>::iterator i = seq.begin(); i != seq.end(); ++i)
        std::cout << *i << " ";
    LinearTimeSelect<std::vector<int> > alg(seq);
    std::cout << std::endl << "linear-time medians: "
        << alg.nth((seq.size()-1) / 2) << ", " << alg.nth(seq.size() / 2);
    std::sort(seq.begin(), seq.end());
    std::cout << std::endl << "medians by sorting: "
        << seq[(seq.size()-1) / 2] << ", " << seq[seq.size() / 2] << std::endl;
    return 0;
}

Here is an answer that considers the suggestion by @MatthieuM. ie does not modify the input vector. It uses a single partial sort (on a vector of indices) for both ranges of even and odd cardinality, while empty ranges are handled with exceptions thrown by a vector's at method:

double median(vector<int> const& v)
{
    bool isEven = !(v.size() % 2); 
    size_t n    = v.size() / 2;

    vector<size_t> vi(v.size()); 
    iota(vi.begin(), vi.end(), 0); 

    partial_sort(begin(vi), vi.begin() + n + 1, end(vi), 
        [&](size_t lhs, size_t rhs) { return v[lhs] < v[rhs]; }); 

    return isEven ? 0.5 * (v[vi.at(n-1)] + v[vi.at(n)]) : v[vi.at(n)];
}

Demo

Armadillo has an implementation that looks like the one in the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/34077478 by https://stackoverflow.com/users/2608582/matthew-fioravante

It uses one call to nth_element and one call to max_element and it is here: https://gitlab.com/conradsnicta/armadillo-code/-/blob/9.900.x/include/armadillo_bits/op_median_meat.hpp#L380

//! find the median value of a std::vector (contents is modified)
template<typename eT>
inline 
eT
op_median::direct_median(std::vector<eT>& X)
  {
  arma_extra_debug_sigprint();
  
  const uword n_elem = uword(X.size());
  const uword half   = n_elem/2;
  
  typename std::vector<eT>::iterator first    = X.begin();
  typename std::vector<eT>::iterator nth      = first + half;
  typename std::vector<eT>::iterator pastlast = X.end();
  
  std::nth_element(first, nth, pastlast);
  
  if((n_elem % 2) == 0)  // even number of elements
    {
    typename std::vector<eT>::iterator start   = X.begin();
    typename std::vector<eT>::iterator pastend = start + half;
    
    const eT val1 = (*nth);
    const eT val2 = (*(std::max_element(start, pastend)));
    
    return op_mean::robust_mean(val1, val2);
    }
  else  // odd number of elements
    {
    return (*nth);
    }
  }

you can use this approch. It also takes care of sliding window.
Here days are no of trailing elements for which we want to find median and this makes sure the original container is not changed


#include<bits/stdc++.h>

using namespace std;

int findMedian(vector<int> arr, vector<int> brr, int d, int i)
{
    int x,y;
    x= i-d;
    y=d;
    brr.assign(arr.begin()+x, arr.begin()+x+y);


    sort(brr.begin(), brr.end());

    if(d%2==0)
    {
        return((brr[d/2]+brr[d/2 -1]));
    }

    else
    {
        return (2*brr[d/2]);
    }

    // for (int i = 0; i < brr.size(); ++i)
    // {
    //     cout<<brr[i]<<" ";
    // }

    return 0;

}

int main()
{
    int n;
    int days;
    int input;
    int median;
    int count=0;

    cin>>n>>days;

    vector<int> arr;
    vector<int> brr;

    for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
    {
        cin>>input;
        arr.push_back(input);
    }

    for (int i = days; i < n; ++i)
    {
        median=findMedian(arr,brr, days, i);

        
    }



    return 0;
}