开发者

Questions about a array of pointers in c++

Hi there i have some questions about pointers and arrays in c++:

when i want to pass an array of pointers in a function i must write:

foo(test *ptest[])

right?

when i want to delete a array of pointers, does

delete ptest;

all for me?

when i pass 开发者_Python百科a pointer to another class and the first class make a delete, the pointer is deletete in all classes right?

must i always create a array of a constant size?


First of all, forget about arrays and pointers and tell us what you really want to achieve. You are probably better off using std::vector<T> and pass that around by (const) reference, saving you all the headaches of manual resource management and crazy array-to-pointer-decay rules inherited from C.

Now to answer your questions:

when i want to pass an array of pointers in a function i must write:

foo(test *ptest[])

right?

Yes, but remember that array parameters are always rewritten by the compiler to pointers. Your code is equivalent to:

 foo(test **ptest)

This means that all information about the size of the array has been lost. Moving on:

when i want to delete a array of pointers, does

delete ptest;

all for me?

No. If you acquire via new[], you must release via delete[], otherwise you get undefined behavior. Note that deleting an array of pointers only gets rid of the array itself, not any objects pointed to by the pointers stored inside the array.

Again: Forget about arrays and pointers and use the facilities provided by the C++ standard library.


when i want to delete a array of pointers, does delete ptest; all for me?

Nope. It tries to delete what's been allocated to the address ptest. If ptest is not something which was allocated dynamically, your program will crash. You can only call delete on the addresses which you have received from new.

when i pass a pointer to another class and the first class make a delete, the pointer is deletete in all classes right?

Nope, you need to have exactly one delete for every new. (yah, there are "smart pointers" which call delete for you, but the point still holds.)

must i always create a array of a constant size?

Nope. In C++ there's std::vector for having arrays of dynamic size (can be used for constant-size arrays too) and in C there's realloc for changing a size of an array.


To delete any array you need:

delete [] ptest; // note the [] part

Arrays can be any size you like (within various practical limits) and unless you make copies of an array then you should delete it exactly once (it doesn't matter where you do this, so long as you don't try to acess the data afterwards).


Chances are, without knowing what you're aiming at and any other contextual information, you should use std::vector<T> instead and forget about these worries.

That said, to delete any primitive array arr you must say

delete[] arr;

Of course, if the pointers in the array themselves are each the last pointing at heap memory then you should free them first. You can do that nicely with a reusable Delete functor:

struct Delete {
    template<class P>
    void operator()(P ptr) const { delete ptr; }
};

// ...
std::foreach(arr, arr+ARR_LENGTH, Delete());
delete[] arr;

You must of course make sure no two pointers point at the same address. To further simplify things beyond what a std::vector<T> can do for you you should consider using a boost::shared_ptr<T>; this will allow you to forget about the delicate case in which two pointers point at the same address.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜