WCF MessageContract List Serialization
I have the following MessageContracts to use as a request:
<MessageContract(WrapperName:="get")> _
Public Class GetRequest
Inherits BaseAuthenticatedRequest
Protected _typeName As cEnum.eType
Protected _id As Integer
<MessageBodyMember()> _
Public Property TypeName() As cEnum.eType
...
<MessageBodyMember()> _
Public Property Id() As Integer
...
End Class
<MessageContract(WrapperName:="getLimited")> _
Public Class GetLimitedRequest
Inherits GetRequest
Protected _propertyList As List(Of String)
<MessageBodyMember(Namespace:=Api2Information.Namespace)> _
Public Prope开发者_C百科rty PropertyList() As List(Of String)
...
End Class
But when testing in SoapUI, the getLimited request body is being created as:
<v2:getLimited>
<!--Optional:-->
<v2:Id>?</v2:Id>
<!--Optional:-->
<v2:PropertyList>
<!--Zero or more repetitions:-->
<arr:string>?</arr:string>
</v2:PropertyList>
<!--Optional:-->
<v2:TypeName>?</v2:TypeName>
</v2:getLimited>
Where v2
= Api2Information.Namespace. What I really want is for the strings contained within PropertyList to be namespaced as v2
, not arr
. Is there anyway for me to achieve that? I'm converting an ASMX service to use WCF and we have a few applications where we cannot afford to have to recompile and redistribute.
Thanks for your helps!
I found what I was looking for. Using a custom collection type like:
<CollectionDataContract(Namespace:=Api2Information.Namespace)> _
Public Class PropertyList : Inherits List(Of String)
End Class
and replacing occurrences of it in my contracts like:
<MessageContract(WrapperName:="getLimited")> _
Public Class GetLimitedRequest
Inherits GetRequest
Protected _propertyList As PropertyList
<MessageBodyMember(Namespace:=Api2Information.Namespace)> _
Public Property PropertyList() As PropertyList
...
End Class
Produces the output:
<v2:getLimited>
<!--Optional:-->
<v2:Id>?</v2:Id>
<!--Optional:-->
<v2:PropertyList>
<!--Zero or more repetitions:-->
<v2:string>?</v2:string>
</v2:PropertyList>
<!--Optional:-->
<v2:TypeName>?</v2:TypeName>
</v2:getLimited>
精彩评论