Stubbing named_scope in an RSpec Controller
I haven't been able to find anything for a situation like this. I have a model which has a named scope defined thusly:
class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base
# ...
named_scope :active_customers, :conditions => { :active => true }
end
and I'm trying to stub it out in my Controller spec:
# spec/customers_controller_spec.rb
describe CustomersController do
before(:each) do
Customer.stub_chain(:active_customers).and_return(@customers = mock([Customer]))
end
it "should retrieve a list of all customers" do
get :index
response.should be_success
Customer.should_receive(:active_customers).and_return(@customers)
end
end
This is not working and is failing, saying that Customer expects active_customers but received 开发者_如何学JAVAit 0 times. In my actual controller for the Index action I have @customers = Customer.active_customers
. What am I missing to get this to work? Sadly, I'm finding that it's easier to just write the code than it is to think of a test/spec and write that since I know what the spec is describing, just not how to tell RSpec what I want to do.
I think there's some confusion when it comes to stubs and message expectations. Message expectations are basically stubs, where you can set the desired canned response, but they also test for the call to be made by the code being tested. In contrast stubs are just canned responses to the method calls. But don't mix a stub with a message expectation on the same method and test or bad things will happen...
Back to your question, there are two things (or more?) that require spec'ing here:
- That the CustomersController calls
Customer#active_customers
when you do aget
onindex
. Doesn't really matter whatCustomer#active_customers
returns in this spec. - That the
active_customers
named_scope does in fact return customers where theactive
field istrue
.
I think that you are trying to do number 1. If so, remove the whole stub and simply set the message expectation in your test:
describe CustomersController do
it "should be successful and call Customer#active_customers" do
Customer.should_receive(:active_customers)
get :index
response.should be_success
end
end
In the above spec you are not testing what it returns. That's OK since that is the intent of the spec (although your spec is too close to implementation as opposed to behavior, but that's a different topic). If you want the call to active_customers
to return something in particular, go ahead and add .and_returns(@whatever)
to that message expectation. The other part of the story is to test that active_customers
works as expected (ie: a model spec that makes the actual call to the DB).
You should have the array around the mock if you want to test that you receive back an array of Customer records like so:
Customer.stub_chain(:active_customers).and_return(@customers = [mock(Customer)])
stub_chain has worked the best for me.
I have a controller calling
ExerciseLog.this_user(current_user).past.all
And I'm able to stub that like this
ExerciseLog.stub_chain(:this_user,:past).and_return(@exercise_logs = [mock(ExerciseLog),mock(ExerciseLog)])
精彩评论