Why is this a function declared inside the module and then used somewhere else in the same module not seen by the linker?
I have a function (in case anyone is interested, it is this function) in a module that looks like this
MODULE MYMODULE
IMPLICIT NONE
! Some random stuff
CONTAINS
CHARACTER*255 FUNCTION strtok ( source_string, delimiters )
[...]
END FUNCTION strtok
SUBROUTINE DO_SOMETHING ( )
CHARACTER(LEN=255) :: strtok
[...] !
END SUBROUTINE DO_SOMETHING
END MODULE MYMODULE
The strtok
function is a version of C's strings tokenizer, and I'll be using this function from the DO_SOMETHING
subroutine. I need to define strtok
, otherwise gfortran complains about it being not defined. However, if I do, and compile my code and link it to the main program, the linker compl开发者_开发问答ains about an undefined reference to strtok_
. I have no idea why this is the case, as they are both in the same module and should be visible. Other functions and subroutines in the same module don't have this problem. Is this something to do with the fact that this is a character*-returning function?
In the following, I'll explain using the complete example below (which you can compile and link to try things):
module mymodule
contains
integer function foo ()
foo = 1
end function
integer function bar ()
integer :: foo
bar = foo()
end function
end module
program test
use mymodule
print *, bar()
end
In the code of function bar
, the declaration integer :: foo
is strictly equivalent to:
integer, external :: foo
Thus, in the code of bar
, you are explicitly stating:
"there may already be a symbol of name
foo
accessible to you, but from now on, when I use it I mean it to be an external function of this name"
So, this is valid code, and the compiler just expect you to provide an external
function named foo
. Because you don't (the module function isn't external), it fails to link. You can provide an external foo
function by adding the following code (not in the module, just at the end of the same file):
integer function foo ()
foo = 42
end function
If you add this function body, then your code will compile, and the output will be 42
(as the external function is called, not the module function).
Also worth noting, if you comment out integer :: foo
line in the code of bar
, symbol foo
will resolve to the module function, which will then be called whether or not you provide an external function named foo
(thus, the output will be 1
).
Conclusion: not a compiler bug, but misuse of an old feature of the language (external declarations). To be honest, I think it's better to explicitly mark your external
declarations as such, which would at least have highlighted the issue here.
Judging from the incomplete source code you posted, I'm thinking this may be the offending line:
CHARACTER(LEN=255) :: strtok
Since the subroutine DO_SOMETHING
and the function strtok
are in the same module, they automatically know about each other's definition (they have an explicit interface). This means it is not only unnecessary to redeclare the function strtok
's type inside DO_SOMETHING
, but what actually happens is that this line declares a new character variable named strtok
in the scope of subroutine DO_SOMETHING
, overruling the module function with the same name.
Basically, inside the subroutine, the identifier strtok
refers to a variable, so when you try to refer to a function by that name, the compiler doesn't know about it.
Hmm, now that I'm writing this, I'm starting to think this should give a compile time error, not a linking error. Still, might be worth it to try and comment out the line I mentioned and give it a go.
精彩评论