开发者

Automatic service discovery protocols [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.

We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.

Closed 8 years ago.

Improve this question

I am currently looking into a variety of service discovery protocols available to Java and have come up with a small list:

  • DNS-SD[1] a.k.a mDNS - implemented by jmDNS and also used as a backend for Zeroconf/Bonjour discovery provider for ECF (Eclipse Communication Framework)
  • UPnP[2] - implemented by Cling library
  • SLP - implemented by OpenSLP and jSLP projects (later is also available as ECF Discovery provider)

There's probably more options, if so, I invite you to add tham to the mix.

I would love to get some objective listings of each protocol's pros and cons from people who have used one or many of these. How does implementation of publishing and discovering a service look like, what is the "chattiness" of the protocol, how reliable is it (both - the protocol and the implementations), does it require centralized serv开发者_开发技巧ice directory or is it p2p/decentralized etc.

Which one would you choose to provide seamless automatic discovery of multiple devices/services on the LAN?


jmdns - the underlying algorithms are much simpler than uPnP. Simplicity counts here.


Although this is old, I will dovetail into the answer that suggested using ZooKeeper.

Netflix released Curator, a framework and client wrapper around ZooKeeper, which includes (among other recipies) a Service Discovery extension.


Apache ZooKeeper can be used for service discovery as well

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜