Event manager process in erlang. Named processes or Pids?

I have event开发者_JAVA技巧 manager process that dispatches events to subscribers (e.g. http_session_created, http_sesssion_destroyed). If Pid is used instead of named process, I must put it into functions to operate with event manager but if Named process is used, code will be more clear.

Which variant is right?

Thank you!

While there is no actual difference to the process naming a process, registering it, makes it global. You in essence you are telling the system that here is a global service which anyone can use.

From you description it more sounds like you are giving them names to save the, small, effort of carrying them around in your loop. If this is the case I would put their pids in a record with all the other state data you carry around. This much better indicates the type of the processes.

If you have a fixed set of "subscriber" processes, then use registered names IMO.

If, on the contrary, you have a publish/subscribe sort of architecture where subscribers come and go, then you need an infrastructure to track those and from this point it doesn't really matter if you use Pid() or names.

One of the drawbacks of using registered names is that you need to track them in your code base to avoid "collisions". So it is up to you: personally, I tend to favor named processes as, like you say, it makes reading the code clearer. One way or another, OTP doesn't care.