make sure object only created by factory (C#)
How do I make sure that a certain class is only instantiated by a factory and not by calling new directly?
EDIT: I need the factory to be a separate class (for dependency injection purposes) so I can't make it a static method of the class to be instantiated, and so I can't make new priva开发者_如何转开发te.
If the factory is in the same assembly and you only need protection against external assemblies instantiating the class, you can make the constructor internal. The only way I know to prevent this for all other classes (including those in the same assembly) is to make the instantiated class a nested private class of the factory and only expose it as an interface. If the class is its own factory (a static factory method), then you can make the constructor private, as others have mentioned.
Make its constructors private and supply the factory method as a static method on the class itself.
In most cases you can just make the constructors internal, allowing you to break the factory out into its own class - I've found it's often not worth trying to prevent my own team from using new
to create instances within the class' assembly.
If, for some reason, you need the factory and the constructed class to be in separate assemblies (which means simply using internal
won't work), and you can ensure that your factory gets a chance to run first, you can do this:
// In factory assembly:
public class Factory
{
public Factory()
{
token = new object();
MyClass.StoreCreateToken(token);
}
public MyClass Create()
{
return new MyClass(token);
}
private object token;
}
// In other assembly:
public class MyClass
{
public static void StoreCreateToken(object token)
{
if (token != null) throw new InvalidOperationException(
"Only one factory can create MyClass.");
this.token = token;
}
public MyClass(object token)
{
if (this.token != token) throw new InvalidOperationException(
"Need an appropriate token to create MyClass.");
}
private static object token;
}
Yes, it's cumbersome and awkward. But there may be weird situations where this is actually a good solution.
Make the constructor internal and house the factory in the same assembly.
public MyClass
{
internal MyClass()
{
}
}
in same assembly
public MyClassGenerator
{
public static CreateMyClass()
{
return new MyClass();
}
}
If the factory can't be in the same assembly or this method doesn't work for you, look to Dan's answer
You can make your concrete classes as nested private classes with public constructors inside your factory class - this way your factory can create them, others can't even see them. Anyway you return from factory some interface / abstract class, not concrete type. Of course you won't be able to cast your return type to a concrete type somewhere in a client code but first it's a sign of bad design, second you can always workaround it with more concrete interface / abstract class your nested private class inherits.
you can refer to the Eric Lippert's answer here (for a similar problem): Why Would I Ever Need to Use C# Nested Classes
It will always be created by calling new somewhere, but if you only want that to happen in your factory class, you can set all the constructors to Internal (or Private, and use a Public Static factory method on the same class).
Many people have mentioned using internal, but you can also make your constructors protected and derive a class that just has the static factory method in it. This doesn't prevent others from doing the same thing, but does a pretty good job at restricting direct access to your constructors.
I do not like to have the factory on the type itself especially if it is a domain object. Have it internal if you are having a separate class as factory (which I think you should). Use InternalVisible attribute if the factory is on the different assembly.
精彩评论