开发者

What is the difference between "marker.setVisible(false)" and "marker.setMap(null)" in Google Maps v3?

I want to clear a marker on Google Maps.

What is the difference between marker.setVisible(false) and marker.setMap(null)?

But I don't know, w开发者_开发技巧hich is right?


The difference between the two methods does not seem to be clearly documented. However, note the following:

  • When you use setMap(null), your marker will lose the reference to the Map. If you do not keep a reference to the Map object, you wouldn't be able to reshow the marker.

  • In addition, the setMap() method will not trigger the visible_changed event, while the setVisible() method does (if the visibility is actually toggled).

Example:

var map = new google.maps.Map(document.getElementById('map'), {
  zoom: 4,
  center: new google.maps.LatLng(-25.363, 131.044),
  mapTypeId: google.maps.MapTypeId.ROADMAP
});

var marker = new google.maps.Marker({
  position: new google.maps.LatLng(-25.363, 131.044), 
  map: map
}); 

google.maps.event.addListener(marker, 'visible_changed', function() {
  console.log('visible_changed triggered');
});

marker.setVisible(false); // visible_changed triggered
marker.setVisible(true);  // visible_changed triggered
marker.setMap(null);      // visible_changed not triggered
marker.setMap(map);       // visible_changed not triggered

I guess we should be using the setVisible(false) method when we intend to reshow the marker again on the map, and the setMap(null) when we will not be showing it again.


Another key distinction is that setMap(NULL) releases the resources associated with the marker whereas setVisible(false) just makes the marker invisible, but the resources associated with the marker are still allocated.

If you're dealing with 100s or 1000s of markers, this can become a significant performance and memory issue.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜