Do Ruby objects have a size limit?

I'm building some large strings which have a short lifetime within the application. Will the String objects grow arbitrarily large up to the physical limits of the ruby instance?开发者_JAVA百科

What I'm wondering is if, without any intervention in limiting the string size, my application would get hosed by running out of memory, or whether it would degrade gracefully.

Thanks for any input!

There is a limit. A String can be 2**31 - 1 (and accordingly 2**63 - 1 on 64 bit ruby). You can see the limit with:

>> s = String.new("1" * (2**32))
RangeError: bignum too big to convert into `long'
    from (irb):3:in `*'
    from (irb):3
>> s = String.new("1" * (2**31))
RangeError: bignum too big to convert into `long'
    from (irb):4:in `*'
    from (irb):4

Having said that, while you could try to allocate a string that big it will likely fail (at least on a 32 bit system as typically the maximum amount of memory a process can allocate is between 2.5 and 3GB and a 2**31 - 1 length string is nearly 2GB by itself.) As seen:

>> "1" * (2**30)
NoMemoryError: failed to allocate memory
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb.rb:310:in `inspect'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb.rb:310:in `output_value'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb.rb:159:in `eval_input'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb.rb:271:in `signal_status'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb.rb:155:in `eval_input'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/ruby-lex.rb:244:in `each_top_level_statement'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/ruby-lex.rb:230:in `loop'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/ruby-lex.rb:230:in `each_top_level_statement'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/ruby-lex.rb:229:in `catch'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/ruby-lex.rb:229:in `each_top_level_statement'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb.rb:154:in `eval_input'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb.rb:71:in `start'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb.rb:70:in `catch'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb.rb:70:in `start'
    from /usr/bin/irb:13
Maybe IRB bug!!

I don't believe there is any way to catch the NoMemoryError.

Updated to reflect the comment from sepp2k