开发者

Resource garbage collected too early

I've created a PHP extension with SWIG and everything works fine, but I'm observing some strange garbage collection behavior when chaining method calls. For example, this works:

$results = $response->results();
$row = $results->get(0)->iterator()->next();
printf('%s %s' . "\n", $row->getString(0), $row->getString(1));

But this seg faults:

$row = $response->results()->get(0)->iterator()->next();
printf('%s %s' . "\n", $row->getString(0), $row->getString(1));

The only difference is that the first creates $results, while the second chains the calls together.

SWIG actually only exposes functions to PHP and generates PHP proxy classes to interact with them. These proxy classes basically hold a resource that is passed to each of the exposed functions along with whatever other arguments those functions would normally take. Thinking that maybe these proxy classes were the problem, I reworked the code to bypass them and instead use the exposed functions directly. As before, this works:

$results = InvocationResponse_results($response->_cPtr);
$row = TableIterator_next(Table_iterator(Tables_get($results, 0)));
printf('%s %s' . "\n", Row_getString($row, 0), Row_getString($row, 1));

And again, this seg faults:

$row = TableIterator_next(Table_iterator(Tables_get(InvocationResponse_results($response->_cPtr), 0)));
printf('%s %s' . "\n", Row_getString($row, 0), Row_getString($row, 1));

Again, the only difference is that the first creates $results, while the second chains the calls together.

At this point, I spent awhile debugging in gdb/valgrind and determined that the destructor for what InvocationResponse_results returns is called too early when chaining calls together. To observe, I inserted std::cout statements at the tops of the exposed C++ functions and their destructors. This is the output without chaining:

InvocationResponse_results()
Tables_get()
Table_iterator()
TableIterator_next()
__wrap_delete_TableIterator
Row_getString()
Row_getString()
Hola Mundo
---
__wrap_delete_InvocationResponse
__wrap_delete_Row
__wrap_delete_Tables

I printed --- at the end of the script to be able to differentiate what happens during the script's execution and what happens after. Hola Mundo is from printf. The rest is from C++. As you can see, everything gets called in the expected order. Destructors are only called after the script's execution, though the TableIterator destructor is called earlier than I would have expected. However, this has not caused any problems and is likely unrelated. Now compare this to the output with chaining:

InvocationResponse_results()
Tables_get()
__wrap_delete_Tables
Table_iterator()
TableIterator_next()
__wrap_delete_TableIterator
Row_getS开发者_高级运维tring()
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Without the return value of InvocationResponse_results being saved into $results, it is happily garbage collected before execution even gets out of the call chain (between Tables_get and Table_iterator) and this quickly causes problems down the road, ultimately leading to a seg fault.

I also inspected reference counts using xdebug_debug_zval() in various places, but didn't spot anything unusual. Here is its output on $results and $row without chaining:

results: (refcount=1, is_ref=0)=resource(18) of type (_p_std__vectorT_voltdb__Table_t)
row: (refcount=1, is_ref=0)=resource(21) of type (_p_voltdb__Row)

And on $row with chaining:

row: (refcount=1, is_ref=0)=resource(21) of type (_p_voltdb__Row)

I've spent a couple days on this now and I'm just about out of ideas, so really any insight on how to go about solving this would be greatly appreciated.


This turned out to be part of the problem on a similar debug problem segfaulting. (what Artefacto said)

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜