Why does scanf() need & operator (address-of) in some cases, and not others? [duplicate]
Why do we need to put a &
operator in scanf()
for storing values in an integer array but not while storing a string in a char array?
int a[5];
for(i=0;i<5;i++)
scanf("%d",&a[i]);
but
char s[5]; scanf("%s",s);
We need to pass in the address of the place we store the value, since array is a pointer to first element. So in the case with int/float arrays it basically means (a+i)
.
But whats the case with strings?
scanf accepts a pointer to whatever you are putting the value in. In the first instance, you are passing a reference to the specific int at position i in your integer array. In the second instance you are passing the entire array in to scanf. In C, arrays and pointers are synonymous and can be used interchangeably (sort of). The variable s is actually a pointer to memory that has contiguous space for 5 characters.
When you use the name of an array in an expression (except as the operand of sizeof
or the address-of operator &
), it will evaluate to the address of the first item in that array -- i.e., a pointer value. That means no &
is needed to get the address.
When you use an int (or short, long, char, float, double, etc.) in an expression (again, except as the operand of sizeof
or &
) it evaluates to the value of that object. To get the address (i.e., a pointer value) you need to use the &
to take the address.
All the variables used to recieve values through
scanf()
must be passed by their addresses. This means that all arguments must be pointed to the variables used as arguments.scanf("%d", &count);
Stings are read into character arrays, and the array name without any index is the address of the first element of the array.So to read a string into a character array address, we use
scanf("%s",address);
In this case address is already a pointer and need not to be preceded by the & operator.
scanf("%d", a + i )
works too.
%d
and %s
just tell scanf
what to expect but in both cases it expects an address
in C, arrays and pointers are related.
%s
just says to scanf
to expect a string which is \0
terminated, whether it will fit into the character array or not scanf
doesn't care.
Because characters arrays are already pointers.
You can think of C arrays as pointers to a stack-allocated amount of RAM. You can even use pointer operations on them instead of array indexing. *a
and a[0]
both produce the same result (returning the first character in the array).
精彩评论