开发者

Is it proper for a parent class to reference a property that exists only in the child?

In the project my team is currently working on, we're modifying a commercial PHP application. The app is strewn with code where a parent class checks for and works with a property that doesn't exist in the parent class, like so:

class A 
{
    function doSomething()
    {
        if (property_exists($this, 'some_property'))
        {
            $this->some_property = $_REQUEST['val'];
        }
    }

}

class B extends A
{
    protected $some_property;

    function doSomething()
    {
        parent:开发者_运维技巧:doSomething();
    }
}

We feel vaguely dirty having to modify this code; is this proper design? What are the ways (other than the obvious) something like this can be avoided?


You might consider abstracting the parent class. So the methods that the children must have are declared in the parent, but not implemented.


Relying upon methods that must exist in a subclass is not dirty, as long as you can declare them as abstract.

However, it is not good practice to rely on and manipulate properties outside of a class. It's best to use abstract setters, like this:

abstract class A 
{
    abstract protected function setSomeProperty($data);

    public function doSomething()
    {
        $this->setSomeProperty($_REQUEST['val']);
    }
}

class B extends A
{
    private $some_property;

    public function doSomething()
    {
        parent::doSomething();
    }

    protected function setSomeProperty($data)
    {
        $this->some_property = $data;
    }
}

More info here: PHP Class Abstraction

However, since you said you're not allowed to modify the parent class, I would suggest making a subclass that acts as an Adapter to what the parent class "expects", and a class that you're able to design "properly".


You can create a virtual method hook in the parent class which can later be overridden by children.


I think it's more neat to create a sub-class, where all members have function doSomething(). In that case you don't create a not-working function in a parent class (with eventual hacks), but still have the general "super-function".

class A 
{


}
class C extends A {

    protected $some_property;

    function doSomething()
    {
        $this->some_property = $_REQUEST['val'];
    }
}

class B extends C
{
    protected $some_property;

    function doSomething()
    {
        parent::doSomething();
    }
}
0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜