gcc warning" 'will be initialized after'
I am getting a lot of these warnings from 3rd party code that I cannot modify. Is there a way to disable this warning or at least disable it for c开发者_JAVA技巧ertain areas (like #pragma push/pop in VC++)?
Example:
list.h:1122: warning: `list<LogOutput*, allocator<LogOutput*> >::node_alloc_' will be initialized after
list.h:1117: warning: `allocator<LogOutput*> list<LogOutput*, allocator<LogOutput*> >::alloc_'
Make sure the members appear in the initializer list in the same order as they appear in the class
Class C {
int a;
int b;
C():b(1),a(2){} //warning, should be C():a(2),b(1)
}
or you can turn -Wno-reorder
You can disable it with -Wno-reorder
.
For those using QT having this error, add this to .pro file
QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_WARN_ON += -Wno-reorder
use -Wno-reorder
(man gcc is your friend :) )
Class C {
int a;
int b;
C():b(1),a(2){} //warning, should be C():a(2),b(1)
}
the order is important because if a is initialized before b , and a is depend on b. undefined behavior will appear.
If you're seeing errors from library headers and you're using GCC, then you can disable warnings by including the headers using -isystem
instead of -I
.
Similar features exist in clang.
If you're using CMake, you can specify SYSTEM
for include_directories
.
The order of initialization doesn’t matter. All fields are initialized in the order of their definition in their class/struct. But if the order in initialization list is different gcc/g++ generate this warning. Only change the initialization order to avoid this warning. But you can't define field using in initialization before its construct. It will be a runtime error. So you change the order of definition. Be careful and keep attention!
精彩评论