SomeClass* initialEl = new SomeClass[5];
Should SomeClass* initialEl = new SomeClass[5]; necessarily compile, assuming SomeClass does not have a non-publicly declared default constructor? Consider:
/*
* SomeClass.h
*
*/
#ifndef SOMECLASS_H_
#define SOMECLASS_H_
class SomeClass
{
public:
SomeClass(int){}
~SomeClass(){}
};
#endif /* SOMECLASS_H_ */
/*
* main.cpp
*
*/
#include "SomeClass.h"
int main()
{
S开发者_如何学ComeClass* initialEl = new SomeClass[5];
delete[] initialEl;
return 0;
}
Assuming SomeClass
has a publicly accessible default constructor, yes.
Note that there is a difference between
- having a publicly accessible default constructor (what i said) and
- not having a non-publicly declared default constructor (what you said)
For the following class 2. is true but 1. is not:
class A {
SomeClass(const SomeClass&) {}
};
This is due to §12.1/5 (C++03):
If there is no user-declared constructor for class X, a default constructor is implicitly declared. An implicitly-declared default constructor is an
inline public
member of its class.
With your update, SomeClass
doesn't have a default constructor. You didn't declare one and because you have declared another constructor the compiler won't declare it implicitly either.
If you need one you have to implement it yourself:
class A {
public:
SomeClass(int) {}
SomeClass() {}
};
Or let another constructor qualify as a default constructor:
class A {
public:
SomeClass(int=0) {}
};
No, it won't compile without a default constructor. There is no compiler-generated default constructor in this case, because you have defined another constructor. "The compiler will try to generate one if needed and if the user hasn't declared other constructors." -- The C++ Programming Language, Stroustrup
If you really want to use new SomeClass[5]
, you'll have to provide a default constructor as well.
精彩评论