SubSonic + Oracle - what's better 2.2 or 3?

I've been using SubSonic 2 & 2.2 for a few years now with Sql Server. For my new job I just recently used SubSonic 2.2 with Oracle and ran into a few small issues.

Example: It could not find a column in a table at run time even though it found it during the mapping.

Does SubSonic 3 offer better Oracle support than 2.2 ?

It seems that SubSonic 2.2 does not support Stored Procs and 开发者_如何学编程 SubSonic 3 does not work at all for Oracle

I have not used subsonic 3 with oracle. But have used with sql server.

The Difference between subsonic versions.

It works great and with the new features.

You can find the oracle templates and other subsonic 3 docs here.

I would recommand to go for the subsonic 3.

I use SubSonic 2.2 because our Desktop app needs to support Windows 2000 so we are limited to .net 2.0

If you don't have to support .net 2.0 I would suggest using SubSonic 3 for new projects.

Advantages of SubSonic 3:

• T4 Engine for Template generation
• Simple Repository (if you want to use it)
• All the nice language sugar (linq, extension methods, expressions)
• better support for unit testing

and SubSonic 2 hasn't seen an update for over a year now.