Integer type reference String type value

two class:

public class BaseDo<K> {
    protected K id;

    public K getId() {
        return id;
开发者_运维百科    }

    public void setId(K id) {
        this.id = id;
    }
}


public class BeanDo extends BaseDo<Integer> {
    private String beanName;

    public String getBeanName() {
        return beanName;
    }

    public void setBeanName(String beanName) {
        this.beanName = beanName;
    }
}

I want use reflect to implment like this:

BeanDo beanDo = new BeanDo();
beanDo.setId("string here");

Integer type reference String type value.

Generics in Java are not used at runtime, so as far as the java runtime is concerned you're ID field is of type Object and so can be set to any value regardless of the generics. That said, doing so is a bad idea since anything assuming the generic contract will fail.

You can set the field by reflection as follows:

BeanDo beanDo = new BeanDo();
Method method = BeanDo.getClass().getMethod("setId", Object.class);
method.invoke(beanDo, "SomeRandomString");

That said, doing this is an extreamly bad idea because any code compile against BeanDo will assume that the id is an integer not a String. So any code like beanDo.getId() will fail with a class cast exception because it's not actually an integer.

Like the other posters, I'm somewhat in the dark about what you're trying to achieve.

Something like this?

public class BaseDo<K> {

  protected K id;

  public K getId() {
    return id;
  }

  public void setId(K id) {
    this.id = id;
  }

}

public class BeanDo extends BaseDo<Integer> { 

  private String beanName;

  public void setId(String id) {
    setId(Integer.parseInt(id));
  }

  public String getBeanName() {
    return beanName;
  }

  public void setBeanName(String beanName) {
    this.beanName = beanName;
  }

}

Now you can use something like this:

BeanDo beanDo = new BeanDo();
beanDo.setId("2");

What about this:

BeanDo beando = new BeanDo();
beando.setId("string there".hashCode());

I don't quite get what you mean with "I want to use reflect to implement this" though.

I guess you want something like this:

    BeanDo doer = ... // get it from somewhere
    String id   = ... // get it from somewhere else too. 

    // and you want to set id to the doer bean.
    reflectionMagicSetId( doer, id ); 

And have the method like:

 private void reflectionMagicSetId( BandDo doer, String id ) {
       /// do some magic here? 
 }

If that's what you want, what I give you works perfectly.

 private void reflectionMagicSetId( BandDo doer, String id ) {
     doer.setId( id == null ? 0 : id.hashCode()  );
 }

If you wann use integer then parse the string to integer as it will contain the integer and use that integer in the calling function argument

It seems like a subclass about the only way to be able to set a string, but still guarantee that anyone who's already calling getId() gets the Integer they expect. Something like this:

public class StringBeanDo extends BeanDo {
  private String stringId;

  public String getStringId()
  {
    return stringId;
  }

  public void setId( Integer val )
  {
    super.setId( val );
    stringId = Integer.toString( val );
  }

  public void setId( String str )
  {
    stringId = str;
    super.setId( convertStringToInteger( str )); // Do this however you like.
  }
}

The implementation of convertStringToInteger would be up to you (it'll depend on what this ID is being used for). The key here is that you're maintaining TWO IDs, and keeping them in sync, so that older code can still limp along to some extent.