Is the following valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional?
The w3c validator service complains that the following html is invalid. It does not like the ampersand(&) in my javascript. But ampersands are allowed in javascript strings, aren't they?
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>Page Title</title>
</head>
<body>
<script type="text/javascript">
function search(query) {
redir = "http://search.mysite.com/search?s=FIN&ref=&q=" + query;
window.location.href = redir
return false;
}
</script>
<span>This is all valid HTM开发者_StackOverflowL</span>
</body>
</html>
All browsers will take this, but to make it valid X(HT)ML you need to put the Javascript code in a CDATA block.
Even in javascript w3c validator don't like ampersands. Try to comment your javascript from validator
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>Page Title</title>
</head>
<body>
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[//><!--
function search(query) {
redir = "http://search.mysite.com/search?s=FIN&ref=&q=" + query;
window.location.href = redir
return false;
}
//--><!]]>
</script>
<span>This is all valid HTML</span>
</body>
</html>
No, it is indeed not valid. If you want to use in-line JavaScript in an XHTML file, you'll need to wrap the JavaScript in CDATA. If you don't want to do that, then you're stuck with encoding &, < and >, which in JavaScript can be quite a pain.
精彩评论