How come the Actionscript 3 ENTER_FRAME event is crazy nuts?

So, I've been toying around with Flash, browsing through the documentation, and all that, and noticed that the ENTER_FRAME event seems to defy my expectation of a deterministic universe.

Take the following example:

(new MovieClip()).addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, 
     function(ev) {trace("Test");});

Notice this anonymous MovieClip is not added to the display hierarchy, and any reference to it is immediately lost.

It will actually print "Test" once a frame until it is garbage collected. How insane is that? The behavior of this is actually determined by when the garbage collector feels like coming around in all its unpredictable insanity! Is there a better way to create intermittent failures? Seriously.

My two theories are that either the DisplayObject class stores weak references to all its instances for the purpose of dispatching ENTER_FRAME events, or, and much wilder, the Flash player actually scans the heap each frame looking for ENTER_FRAME listeners t开发者_如何转开发o pull on.

Can any hardened Actionscript developer clue me in on how this works? (And maybe a why - the - f**k they thought this was a good idea?)

Short answer: you get what you ask for.

The fact that your MovieClip is "anonymous", as you call it, doesn't change how garbage collection works.

Both of your theories are wrong. It's simpler. You asked your MovieClip instance to notify you whenever a frame is entered. Quote from the docs:

Dispatched when the playhead is entering a new frame. If the playhead is not moving, or if there is only one frame, this event is dispatched continuously in conjunction with the frame rate. This event is dispatched simultaneously to all display objects listenting for this event.

And this is what is happening.

Objects such as MovieClips are heap allocated. If you store a reference to it in a local variable, the reference lives in the stack and will get out of scope when you return from your function. You'll have no way to refer to the object, but the object will still be alive, in the heap. So, whether you store a reference to the mc instance or not, that doesn't change this basic fact of how heap and garbage collection works.

Now, since the are no strong refs to this object, this object is elligible for collection. This does not mean it will be collected when the function returns.

Since the object is still alive, it will continue to dispatch the event, because you asked for it. Once it's collected, naturally, your code in the handler will no longer be executed.

Edit

I said that both of your theories are wrong. I think that's the case from an Actionscript perspective. However, at the player level, it seems evident that the player has to keep track of objects on which it must fire certain events, so yes, it must be storing an internal reference to said objects. This is no different to how it works for other objects that are globally handled by the player, though, such as for instance, loaders. There's one exception to this that I'm aware of: running Timers. As long as a Timer is running, it won't be collected, even though you don't have any Actionscript reference to it.