Generate a random number within range? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here: Closed 12 years ago.

Pos开发者_如何学运维sible Duplicate:

Generating Random Numbers in Objective-C

How do I generate a random number which is within a range?

---

This is actually a bit harder to get really correct than most people realize:

int rand_lim(int limit) {
/* return a random number between 0 and limit inclusive.
 */

    int divisor = RAND_MAX/(limit+1);
    int retval;

    do { 
        retval = rand() / divisor;
    } while (retval > limit);

    return retval;
}

Attempts that just use % (or, equivalently, /) to get the numbers in a range almost inevitably introduce skew (i.e., some numbers will be generated more often than others).

As to why using % produces skewed results: unless the range you want is a divisor of RAND_MAX, skew is inevitable. If you start with small numbers, it's pretty easy to see why. Consider taking 10 pieces of candy (that we'll assume you can't cut, break, etc. into smaller pieces) and trying to divide it evenly between three children. Clearly it can't be done--if you hand out all the candy, the closest you can get is for two kids to get three pieces of candy, and one of them getting four.

There's only one way for all the kids to get the same number of pieces of candy: make sure you don't hand out the last piece of candy at all.

To relate this to the code above, let's start by numbering the candies from 1 to 10 and the kids from 1 to 3. The initial division says since there are three kids, our divisor is three. We then pull a random candy from the bucket, look at its number and divide by three and hand it to that kid -- but if the result is greater than 3 (i.e. we've picked out candy number 10) we just don't hand it out at all -- we discard it and pick out another candy.

Of course, if you're using a modern implementation of C++ (i.e., one that supports C++11 or newer), you should usually use one the distribution classes from the standard library. The code above corresponds most closely with std::uniform_int_distribution, but the standard library also includes uniform_real_distribution as well as classes for a number of non-uniform distributions (Bernoulli, Poisson, normal, maybe a couple others I don't remember at the moment).

---

int rand_range(int min_n, int max_n)
{
    return rand() % (max_n - min_n + 1) + min_n;
}

For fractions:

double rand_range(double min_n, double max_n)
{
    return (double)rand()/RAND_MAX * (max_n - min_n) + min_n;
}

---

For an integer value in the range [min,max):

double scale = (double) (max - min) / RAND_MAX;
int val = min + floor(rand() * scale) 

---

I wrote this specifically in Obj-C for an iPhone project:

- (int) intInRangeMinimum:(int)min andMaximum:(int)max {
    if (min > max) { return -1; }
    int adjustedMax = (max + 1) - min; // arc4random returns within the set {min, (max - 1)}
    int random = arc4random() % adjustedMax;
    int result = random + min;
    return result;
}

To use:

int newNumber = [aClass intInRangeMinimum:1 andMaximum:100]; 

Add salt to taste

---

+(NSInteger)randomNumberWithMin:(NSInteger)min WithMax:(NSInteger)max {
    if (min>max) {
        int tempMax=max;
        max=min;
        min=tempMax;
    }
    int randomy=arc4random() % (max-min+1);
    randomy=randomy+min;
    return randomy;
}

I use this method in a random number related class I made. Works well for my non-demanding needs, but may well be biased in some way.