bash testing a group of directories for existence

Have documents stored in a file system which includes "daily" directories, e.g. 20050610. In a bash script I want to list the files in a months worth of these directories. So I'm runni开发者_运维问答ng a find command find <path>/200506* -type f >> jun2005.lst. Would like to check that this set of directories is not a null set before executing the find command. However, if I use if[ -d 200506* ] I get a "too many arguements error. How can I get around this?

Your "too many arguments" error does not come from there being a huge number of files and exceeding the command line argument limit. It comes from having more than one or two directories that match the glob. Your glob "200506*" expands to something like "20050601 20050602 20050603..." and the -d test only expects one argument.

$ mkdir test
$ cd test
$ mkdir a1
$ [ -d a* ]    # no error
$ mkdir a2
$ [ -d a* ]
-bash: [: a1: binary operator expected
$ mkdir a3
$ [ -d a* ]
-bash: [: too many arguments

The answer by zed_0xff is on the right track, but I'd use a different approach:

shopt -s nullglob
path='/path/to/dirs'
glob='200506*/'
outfile='jun2005.lst'
dirs=("$path"/$glob)  # dirs is an array available to be iterated over if needed
if (( ${#dirs[@]} > 0 ))
then
    echo "directories found"
    # append may not be necessary here 
    find "$path"/$glob -type f >> "$outfile"
fi

The position of the quotes in "$path"/$glob versus "$path/$glob" is essential to this working.

Edit:

Corrections made to exclude files that match the glob (so only directories are included) and to handle the very unusual case of a directory named literally like the glob ("200506*").

prefix="/tmp/path"
glob="200611*"
n_dirs=$(find $prefix -maxdepth 1 -type d -wholename "$prefix/$glob" |wc -l)
if [[ $n_dirs -gt 0 ]];then 
   find $prefix -maxdepth 2 -type f -wholename "$prefix/$glob" 
fi

S=200506*

if [ ${#S} -gt 6 ]; then
    echo haz filez!
else
    echo no filez
fi

not a very elegant one, but w/o any external tools/commands (if don't think of "[" as an external one)

the clue is if there is some files matched, then "S" variable will contain their names delimited with space. Otherwise it will contain a "200506*" string itself.

You could us ls like this:

  if [ -n "$(ls -d | grep 200506)" ]; then
        # There are directories with this pattern
  fi

Because there is a limit on command line length in most shells: anything like "$(ls -d | grep 200506)" or /path/200506* will run the risk of overflowing the limit. I'm not sure if substitutions and glob expansions count towards it in BASH, but I assume so. You would have to test it and check the bash docs and source to be sure.

The answer is in simplifying your question.

find <path>/200506* -type f -exec somescript '{}' \;

Where somescript is a shell script that does the test. Something like this perhaps:

#!/bin/sh
[ -d "$@" ] && echo "$@" >> june2005.lst

Passing the june2005.lst to the script (advice: use an environment variable), and dealing with any possibility that 200506* may expand to tooo huge a file path, being left as an exercise for the OP ;)

Integrating the whole thing into a pipe line or adapting a more general scripting language would yield performance boosts, by minimizing the number of shells spawned. Now that would be fun. Here is a hint for that, use -exec and another program (awk, perl, etc) to do the directory test as part of a one line filter, and keep the >>june2005.lst on the find command.