开发者

Is it bad for SEO to have an 'article' published under 2 urls? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.

This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.

Closed 8 years ago.

Improve this question

On our new website we publish an article once and can tag it to appear in several sections eg.

blahblah.com/insight/10-05-21/Buzzcity-releases-mobile-game-library.aspx

blahblah.com/international_media/10-05-21/Buzzcity-releases-mobile-game-library.aspx

Is it better for SEO to have the 2 different urls which include important keywords like ‘insight’ and ‘international media’ or is it better to have a single generic url? E.g. blahblah.com/articles/10-05-21/Buzzcity_rele开发者_如何学JAVAases_mobile_game_library.aspx

I read somewhere that google doesn’t like the same content ‘duplicated’ in 2 (or 3) places - I am not a tecchie.

THanks


Google will penalise for duplication. The way that you should solve this is to indicate a canonical url scheme to Google.

See: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66359 and http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139066

Personally, I would put all the keywords you want in one heading and always remember the golden rule of SEO: the best way to get good rankings is to have good, relevant, content.


A canonical link should only be used if the duplicate content problem cannot be solved at it's source. Assuming you're in charge of the URL-scheme of the website, you should consider reformatting it.

Personally, I try to keep a hierarchical url-scheme. If your articles are related to a number of things (tags, authors, sections), think about how your data is related. If your article cannot logically exist without a related element (e.g. deleting a section from a newspaper, would logically cause a cascade delete on it's articles) it should be considered for use as parent in the URL hierarchy. If no such relation is present, the URL-scheme should be formatted accordingly.

Consider the following examples. You can choose between a number of parents for your articles example.com/authors/alichard/articles/buzzcity..., example.com/tags/insight/articles/buzzcity..., etc.

In the end, there is no right way to do it. But IMHO you should either stash all your tags in the article URL (example.com/insight+international_media/buzzcity...) or go for a tag-less article URL (example.com/articles/buzzcity and example.com/articles/tagged/insight for article listing).

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜