开发者

Get minvalue of a Map(Key,Double)

Is there a method (maybe with Google Collections) to obtain the min value of a Map(Key, Double)?

In the traditional way, I would have to sort th开发者_如何转开发e map according to the values, and take the first/last one.


You can use the standard Collections#min() for this.

Map<String, Double> map = new HashMap<String, Double>();
map.put("1.1", 1.1);
map.put("0.1", 0.1);
map.put("2.1", 2.1);

Double min = Collections.min(map.values());
System.out.println(min); // 0.1

Update: since you need the key as well, well, I don't see ways in Collections or Google Collections2 API since a Map is not a Collection. The Maps#filterEntries() is also not really useful, since you only know the actual result at end of iteration.

Most straightforward solution would then be this:

Entry<String, Double> min = null;
for (Entry<String, Double> entry : map.entrySet()) {
    if (min == null || min.getValue() > entry.getValue()) {
        min = entry;
    }
}

System.out.println(min.getKey()); // 0.1

(nullcheck on min left aside)


You still can use Collections.min with a custom Comparator to get the Map.Entry with the lower value:

Map<String, Double> map = new HashMap<String, Double>();
map.put("1.1", 1.1);
map.put("0.1", 0.1);
map.put("2.1", 2.1);
Entry<String, Double> min = Collections.min(map.entrySet(), new Comparator<Entry<String, Double>>() {
    public int compare(Entry<String, Double> entry1, Entry<String, Double> entry2) {
        return entry1.getValue().compareTo(entry2.getValue());
    }
});
System.out.printf("%s: %f", min.getKey(), min.getValue()); // 0.1: 0.100000

With Java 8:

Entry<String, Double> min = Collections.min(map.entrySet(),
                                       Comparator.comparing(Entry::getValue));


Java8 One-Liner

Key key = Collections.min(map.entrySet(), Map.Entry.comparingByValue()).getKey()


In traditional way, I would have to sort the map according to the values, and take the first/last one. thanks

No, you wouldn't. You would have to iterate through all values and at each step compare the current element with the smallest one seen so far. That's O(n), compared with O(n*log(n)) for sorting - a potentially huge difference.

BTW, this is exactly how Collections.min() works.


Using Java 8 streams:

return map
            .entrySet()
            .stream()
            .sorted(Comparator.comparingDouble(Map.Entry::getValue))
            .findFirst()
            .map(Map.Entry::getValue);

Or

return map
            .entrySet()
            .stream()
            .min(Comparator.comparingDouble(Map.Entry::getValue))
            .map(Map.Entry::getValue);

But if you want to do it multiple times, then definitely give heap a look.


I'd be inclined to use a Google Collections BiMap:

     String minKey = HashBiMap.create(map).inverse().get(Collections.min(map.values()));

Or something like that (not tested).


Using java 8 (and static imports). We can make @superfav's solution much tidier:

Map<String, Double> myMap;
String theKeyWithHighestValue = Collections.min(myMap.entrySet(), comparingDouble(Entry::getValue)).getKey()


In Java 8 we can get easily:

Double minValue = map.entrySet().stream().min(Map.Entry.comparingByValue()).get().getValue();
Double maxValue = map.entrySet().stream().max(Map.Entry.comparingByValue()).get().getValue();


In order to do it efficiently, you may want to define your own data structure, such that it implements the Map interface,but also allows efficient getMin() operation.

This can be done using two internal data structures: a map and a tree (or heap data structure). Each time a new pair (K,V) is added, add them to the map, and also to the tree (as a single entry). This allows O(1) time for get(Key) operations, and O(log n) time for addition, removal, and getMin operations.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜