开发者

java: copy-on-write data structure?

Is there anything in Java that implements something like the following

interface MSet<T> extends Iterable<T> {
    /**
     * return a new set which consists of this set plus a new element.
     * This set is not changed.
     */
    MSet<T> add(T t);

    /**
     * return a new set which consists of this set minus a designated element.
     * This set is not changed.
     */
    MSet<T> remove(T t);
}

edit: I want something like CopyOnWriteArraySet, except that class is mutable and I want somethin开发者_JAVA百科g that is an immutable set that allows creation of a new set. The reason for this is that I need to hand out references to the old set and leave them immutable.

edit 2: how does Scala implement scala.collection.immutable.Set? This is the kind of behavior I need, just that I don't want to suck in all of Scala just for this.


Use the Google Collections library Immutable* for all your immutable collection needs. I suppose you'll need a light-weight wrapped class - which can be done very easily with a Forwarding* (also in GC) - that spawns new immutable (or mutable, whatever) on add/remove operations. Finally, if your modifications don't need to themselves be allowed to spawn new modifications, you can implement those operations using the various options in the static collection helper libraries in GC (Iterables, Lists, Sets, etc) to get views (re sets : union, intersection, filter).

edit: however, google-code is veeeeery slow at the moment - might have to wait a bit to check it out.


CopyOnWriteArraySet is similar. However, the copying is internal, so it does not return a reference to a new object.


There are copy-on-write data structures in Java, for example the CopyOnWriteArrayList, however the API is slightly different than the one you have suggested; rather than returning a new object, it has the same API as the other collections, but merely creates a separate copy of the array internally.'

There is no type out of the box with the API that you want; however, it should be fairly trivial to implement; simply duplicate the collection, perform the mutating operation on the duplicate, and return it.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜