emacs debugger: how can I step-out, step-over?
I don't know why I'm having so much trouble groking the documentation for the elisp debugger.
I see it has a commands to "step-into" (d). But for the life of me, I cannot see a step-out or step-over.
Can anyone help?
If I have this in the Backtrace buffer:
Debugger entered--returning value: 5047开发者_如何学C
line-beginning-position()
* c-parse-state()
* byte-code("...")
* c-guess-basic-syntax()
c-show-syntactic-information(nil)
call-interactively(c-show-syntactic-information)
...where do I put the cursor, and what key do I type, to step out of the parse-state() fn ? by that I mean, run until that fn returns, and then stop in the debugger again.
When debugging, I press ? and I see:
o edebug-step-out
f edebug-forward-sexp
h edebug-goto-here
I believe o (it is step-out
) and f (like step over) are what you're looking for, though I also find h extremely useful.
'c' and 'j' work kind of like a step-out and step-over. When a flagged frame (indicated by "*") is encountered (the docs say "exited" but this doesn't seem to be how the debugger behaves), the debugger will be re-entered. When the top frame is flagged, they work like step-over; when it isn't, they work like step-out.
In your example backtrace, typing either will step out of line-beginning-position
into c-parse-state
. The frame flag should clear, so typing either a second time should step out of c-parse-state
.
Hm. I, for one, prefer debug
to edebug
, but to each her own...
As to debug
, I use d
, c
, e
, and q
.
If you do use debug
, one thing to keep in mind, which can save time and effort, is that when you see a macro call (starts with#
) you can just hit c
to expand the macro -- there is normally no sense in digging into the macro expansion code (unless you wrote the macro and you are trying to debug it).
In particular, for dolist
, there are two levels of macroexpansion to skip over using c
: one for dolist
and one for block
.
HTH.
精彩评论