开发者

Clearing cin input: is cin.ignore not a good way?

What's a better way to clear cin input? I thought cin.clear and cin.ignore was a good way?

Code:

 void clearInput()
{   
    cin.clear();
    cin.ignore(1000,'\n');
    //cin.ignore( std::numeric_limits<streamsize>::max(), '\n' );

}

My teacher gave me this reply:

this is basically saying that your clearInput doesn't work FYI: ignore is NEVER a good idea as a way of getting rid of all that remains on a line

and your failing this test is exactly the reason why now go clear it the correct way

She has also told me this following:

on ignore you need to guess at how many characters you want to ignore If you absolutely know your data a开发者_运维百科nd it follows a strict format -- as in Excel spreadsheets, ignore is really good. If you are NOT in this type of file, then you NEVER use ignore. Question, is your data well-formed? If yes, use ignore. If not, don't use ignore.

List ALL the way of getting data? 1) there is extraction >>

and there is also??????

please list for me


Your teacher’s reply are a bit unclear (at least to me).

Concerning ignore, your teacher is wrong in principle: ignore is the standard idiom of how to clear a stream (as shown by Potatocorn, this is even mentioned in the standard).

However, it’s important to notice that cin.ignore(1000) is indeed a bad way of doing this: this just presumes that there won’t be more than 1000 characters in the buffer. Never use such a magic number in ignore.

Instead, either use

  1. cin.rdbuf()->in_avail() (i.e. the available number of chars in the read buffer)1), or use
  2. numeric_limits<streamsize>::max().

1) Unfortunately, in_avail is broken on some recent VC (?) compilers so this method isn’t very portable.


Copy-pasting from the standard,

basic_istream<charT,traits>&
ignore(streamsize n = 1, int_type
delim = traits::eof());

Effects: Behaves as an unformatted input function (as described in 27.6.1.3, paragraph 1). After constructing a sentry object, extracts characters and discards them. Characters are extracted until any of the following occurs:

  • if n != numeric_limits<streamsize>::max() (18.2.1), n characters are extracted
  • end-of-file occurs on the input sequence (in which case the function calls setstate(eofbit), which may throw ios_base::failure (27.4.4.3));
  • c == delim for the next available input character c (in which case c is extracted).

You commented line with numeric_limits<>::max is superior, but it looks like you didn't want to use something you didn't completely understand, which is also good.

The only thing someone could possibly want besides ignore is non-blocking behavior, i.e. don't wait for the user to press return if the terminal is in unbuffered mode. But that's just entirely unsupported by iostreams as far as I know.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜