开发者

AesManaged versus RijndaelManaged [closed]

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect an开发者_如何学运维swers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 9 years ago.

I'm currently porting a piece of code written in .NET 3.5 to 2.0. At some point in the code (heavy load) the AesManaged class is being used, are there any performance gains from this implementation compared to RijndaelManaged, and should there be any risk when changing from AesManaged to RijndaelManaged concerning heavy load?


Actually there is one very subtle difference: Block size.

Rijndael supports block sizes of 128, 192, 256 bits. AES supports only 128 bit block sizes.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜