Transposing JSON list-of-dictionaries for analysis in R
I have experimental data expressed as dicts of key-value pairs for each experiment. A set of related experiments is serialized as a list of these dicts in JSON. This is parseable in in R via the rjson
package, but the data is loaded in a form which is challenging to analyze
data <- fromJSON('[{"k1":"v1","k2":"v2"}, {"k1":"v3","k2":"v4"}]')
yields
[[1]]
[[1]]$k1
[1] "v1"
[[1]]$k2
[1] "v2"
[[2]]
[[2]]$k1
[1] "v3"
[[2]]$k2
[1] "v4"
Attempting to turn this into a data.frame
directly with as.data.frame(data)
yields:
k1 k2 k1.1 k2.1
1 v1 v2 v3 v4
clearly viewing the the sequence of key/value pairs across all experiments as a flat 1-dimensional list.
What I want is a more conventional table with a row for each experiment, and a column for each unique key开发者_StackOverflow:
k1 k2
1 v1 v2
2 v3 v4
How can I cleanly express this transform in R?
The l*ply
functions can be your best friend when doing with list processing. Try this:
> library(plyr)
> ldply(data, data.frame)
k1 k2
1 v1 v2
2 v3 v4
plyr
does some very nice processing behind the scenes to deal with things like irregular lists (e.g. when each list doesn't contain the same number of elements). This is very common with JSON and XML, and is tricky to handle with the base functions.
Or alternatively using base functions:
> do.call("rbind", lapply(data, data.frame))
You can use rbind.fill
(from plyr
) instead of rbind
if you have irregular lists, but I'd advise just using plyr
from the beginning to make your life easier.
Edit:
Regarding your more complicated example, using Hadley's suggestion deals with this easily:
> x<-list(list(k1=2,k2=3),list(k2=100,k1=200),list(k1=5, k3=9))
> ldply(x, data.frame)
k1 k2 k3
1 2 3 NA
2 200 100 NA
3 5 NA 9
This is interesting. The easiest way would be to fix the Python code so that the dict can be transformed more easily.
But, how about this?
k1 <- unlist(lapply(data,FUN=function(x){return(x[[1]])}))
k2 <- unlist(lapply(data,FUN=function(x){return(x[[2]])}))
data.frame(k1,k2)
You will need to cast k1 and k2 into the correct data type still, but this should accomplish what you are looking for.
精彩评论