C++ equivalent for memset on char*
开发者_如何学运维I have this code
char * oldname = new char[strlen(name) + 1];
memcpy(oldname,name,strlen(name) + 1);
name = new char[strlen(oldname) + strlen(r.name) + 1];
memset(name, '\0', strlen(name));
strcat(name,oldname);
strcat(name," ");
strcat(name,r.name);
I understand that it is a no no to use memcpy and memset but I haven't understood exactly how to use this in C++, preferably without std.
Does anyone know? Thank you.
In general, there's std::fill
. http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/algorithm/fill/
Or in this particular instance, you should consider using std::vector<char>
.
(Note that memset
can still be used in C++ if you use #include <cstring>
, although it's less idiomatic in C++.)
One possible replacement for memset
when you have an array of object types is to use the std::fill
algorithm. It works with iterator ranges and also with pointers into arrays.
memcpy
calls can usually be replaced with calls to std::copy
.
e.g.
std::copy(name, name + strlen(name) + 1, oldname);
// ...
std::fill(name, name + strlen(name), '\0');
memset
and memcpy
are still there and can be used when appropriate, though. It's probably a bigger no-no from many C++ developer's point of view to be using a raw new
and not using a resource managing object. It's much better to use a std::string
or a std::vector<char>
so that memory deallocation is automatic and the code is more exception safe.
I understand that it is a no no to use memcpy and memset but I haven't understood exactly how to use this in C++, preferably without std.
It's not a no-no to use memcpy
and memset
when their use is appropriate. Why should it be?
There's std::copy
in C++ that copies a set of items (works on any type and not just char*
) from an iterator to another.
Other than the inconvenience of having to manually copy and do all the memory allocation yourself, there's nothing wrong with that C++ code.
I would, however, strongly encourage the use of std::string
for string manipulation in C++.
If you are just doing string manipulation, use string.
To copy from a to b, take std::copy(src_start,src_end,dest_start)
which increments src_start
and copies it to the next destination element until src_start==src_end
is met.
memcpy(oldname,name,strlen(name)+1)
// is the same as
std::copy(name,name+strlen(name)+1,oldname)
.. except it will also work for non-PODs, and you don't need to mess with byte lengths if a single element is more than one byte.
However, if you just want to do string manipulation, the std::string
class (and std::wstring
for wide char strings) are provided. Concatenating them is as simple as:
std::string s = "name",s2 = ..,s3 = ..;
s = s2+s+s3+"Hello";
Nothing keeps you from using the strxxx
family of functions in C++, but I'd highly recommend you to switch to std::string
and rest of the STL. It's not perfect either, but much less error-prone.
char * oldname = new char[strlen(name) + 1];
//memcpy(oldname,name,strlen(name) + 1);
strcpy(oldname,name);
name = new char[strlen(oldname) + strlen(r.name) + 1];
//memset(name, '\0', strlen(name));
name[0] = '\0';
strcat(name,oldname);
strcat(name," ");
strcat(name,r.name);
I understand this now, just wanted to paste this code for all future visitors The commented lines are equivalent with the uncommented ones below them. C commented, C++ uncommented.
精彩评论