How can I convert a JavaScript for-loop to CoffeeScript?
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
doStuff();
}
That's the JavaScript code that I Want to convert to CoffeeS开发者_如何转开发cript.
doStuff() for i in [0 .. 9]
This is explained on the introduction page: http://coffeescript.org/#loops
Edit/Update by JP:
The exact translation is:
doStuff() for i in [0...10]
You need to be careful with the ".." vs "...", for example:
count = 0
doStuff() for i in [0..count] #still executes once!
So you think, no problem... I'll just loop until count-1!
count = 0
doStuff() for i in [0..count-1] #executes twice!! '0' and then '-1'
Literal translation of:
for (var i = 0; i < someCount; ++i)
doStuff()
is
for i in [0...someCount]
doStuff()
The marked answer is functionaly correct but the generated code doesn't match the original javascript.
The right way (read, the one closest to the following javascript)
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
doStuff();
}
is doStuff() for i in [0..someCount] by 1
Note the by 1 on the for loop.
Now this code, still creates an extra _i
variable. If you can't live with it, then use the following:
i=0
while i<=someCount
doStuff()
i++
Previous answers work. However, dropping the i
generates it better for me:
for [0...10]
doStuff()
or
doStuff() for [0...10]
The other solutions add an extra iterator variable i
for you to use inside of the loop, for example doStuff(i)
, but from http://coffeescript.org/v1/#loops:
If you don’t need the current iteration value you may omit it:
browser.closeCurrentTab() for [0...count]
In detail, the translation of for i in [0...10]
is for (i = j = 0; j < 10; i = ++j)
, whereas the translation of for [0...10]
is for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
.
Note the discussion in other comments about 2-dots versus 3-dots ([0..9]
vs. [0...10]
).
精彩评论