开发者

Objective c isKindOfClass missunderstanding?

I have following structure of objects:

Animal, Dog and Cat. As You expect Dog and Cat are inherited from Animal.

And I've a farm class:

 @implementation AnimalFarm

-(Animal*) createAnimal:(AnimalType)type{

  switch (type) {

    case CAT:
      return [Cat new];

    case DOG:
      return [Dog new];

    default:
      return [Animal new];
  }

}

@end

and I tried to unit test:

  AnimalFarm *farm = [AnimalFarm new];

  Animal *dog = [farm createAnimal:DOG];
  Animal *cat = [farm createAnimal:CAT];

  STAssertTrue([cat isMemberOfClass:[Cat class]],@"cat is not a cat!");
  STAssertTrue([dog isMemberOfClass:[Dog class]],@"Dog is not a dog!");

  STAssertTrue([cat isKindOfClass:[Animal class]],@"Cat is not an animal!");
  STAssertTrue([dog isKindOfClass:[Animal class]],@"Cat is not an animal!");
开发者_运维技巧

Implementation of classes:

@interface Cat : Animal {

}


@end

@implementation Cat

  -(NSString*) say{
    return @"miau";
}

@end

Implementation of dog is similar.

but neither isKindOfClass or isMemberOfClass worked as I expected....

Am I missing something?


When I use IFs instead of switch then everything goes well ... but what is the difference?

Implementation of createAnimal which works:

-(Animal *) createAnimal:(AnimalType)type {

  if (type == DOG) {
    return [Dog new]; 
  } else if (type == CAT) {
    return [Cat new]; 
  } else {
    return [Animal new];
  }


isMemberOfClass: will only return YES if the instance's class is exactly the same, however isKindOfClass: will return YES if the instance's class is the same, or a subclass of the given class.

For example this will output No!:

BOOL result = [[NSMutableArray array] isMemberOfClass:[NSArray class]];
NSLog (@"%@", result? @"Yes!" : @"No!");

But this will output Yes!:

BOOL result = [[NSMutableArray array] isKindOfClass:[NSArray class]];
NSLog (@"%@", result? @"Yes!" : @"No!");

This is because an NSMutableArray is a kind of NSArray, but it isn't a member of the NSArray class (otherwise it wouldn't be an NSMutableArray).

Throughout Foundation and Cocoa, there are a number of "class clusters". You can read more about this in the documentation on Apple's developer web site. Due to the nature of class clusters, if you create perhaps an NSString object, it may fail the isMemberOfClass:[NSString class] test.

If neither isKindOfClass: or isMemberOfClass: is returning the correct value, see what class the actual object is with

NSLog(@"cat class = %@, dog class = %@", [cat className], [dog className]);

If these are returning anything other than what they are supposed to, then there is a problem with your farm class.


Your problem lies elsewhere.

I created your Animal, Dog, and Cat classes, and the four cases you have above passed. For reference, here is my code: http://pastie.org/774468

It outputs:

2010-01-11 19:45:10.259 EmptyFoundation[83698:a0f] [cat isMemberOfClass:[Cat class]] PASSED
2010-01-11 19:45:10.265 EmptyFoundation[83698:a0f] [dog isMemberOfClass:[Dog class]] PASSED
2010-01-11 19:45:10.265 EmptyFoundation[83698:a0f] [cat isKindOfClass:[Animal class]] PASSED
2010-01-11 19:45:10.273 EmptyFoundation[83698:a0f] [dog isKindOfClass:[Animal class]] PASSED

EDIT:

I suppose there was a slight possibility that your AnimalFarm object was the source of the error, but I just tried creating the animal objects that way and got the same results (code: http://pastie.org/774480):

2010-01-11 19:51:35.144 EmptyFoundation[83741:a0f] [cat isMemberOfClass:[Cat class]] PASSED
2010-01-11 19:51:35.156 EmptyFoundation[83741:a0f] [dog isMemberOfClass:[Dog class]] PASSED
2010-01-11 19:51:35.157 EmptyFoundation[83741:a0f] ![ant isMemberOfClass:[Cat class]] PASSED
2010-01-11 19:51:35.157 EmptyFoundation[83741:a0f] [cat isKindOfClass:[Animal class]] PASSED
2010-01-11 19:51:35.157 EmptyFoundation[83741:a0f] [dog isKindOfClass:[Animal class]] PASSED
2010-01-11 19:51:35.158 EmptyFoundation[83741:a0f] [ant isKindOfClass:[Animal class]] PASSED

EDIT #2:

Based on your observation that an if...else if statement works but the switch statement does not, I modified the code I posted above to use a switch statement.... and it worked just fine. So my comment/question stands: In your if/switch statements, you're using these constants DOG and CAT. Where are those defined?


You are missing breaks, that's why your switch isn't working. It should look like this.

switch (type) {

 case CAT:
   return [Cat new];
 break;
 case DOG:
   return [Dog new];
 break;
 default:
   return [Animal new];
 break;
}
0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜