'git pull' branch only
I have a git cloned repository.
The purpose of this repo is git log
, as long there is no such thing as git log over ssh.
$ git ls-remote
ac118076af0ca4c164a831b9e31b1a307747ec36 refs/heads/master
db1253eae8241aa0813d5a49880c41cd810216c2 refs/heads/production/version-2011.10
32c2dcad3133c8214c0d0e898e32b7a7a9f068cf refs/heads/release/version-2011.11
I would like to set-up a read-only branch only for git pull
from remote machine (tracking branch?!).
$ git branch -tb version-2011.11 refs/heads/release/version-2011.11
fatal: git checkout: updating paths is incompatible with swit开发者_C百科ching branches.
Did you intend to checkout 'refs/heads/release/version-2011.11' which can not be resolved as commit?
$ git checkout -tb version-2011.11 release/version-2011.11
fatal: git checkout: updating paths is incompatible with switching branches.
Did you intend to checkout 'release/version-2011.11' which can not be resolved as commit?
In future:
- release/2011.11 will become a production/2011.11
- master -> release/version-2011.12
- and so on...
any suggestions?
git ls-remote
shows you the refs in the remote repository, so refs/heads/release/version-2011.11
is only a valid ref in that repository, not your local clone. If the remote is called origin
(as it would be by default) then your corresponding remote-tracking branch will be called:
refs/remotes/origin/release/version-2011.11
... or you can use the abbreviation: origin/release/version-2011.11
(The error you can see is from git trying to interpret the last parameter as a path, since it doesn't know of a ref with that name.)
If you just want to use git log
, then you don't even have to create a local branch that tracks the remote-tracking branch - you can just do:
git log origin/release/version-2011.11
To update that remote-tracking branch (in case there have been changes in the remote repository) you can just do:
git fetch origin
精彩评论