What are best practices for using SmtpClient, SendAsync and Dispose under .NET 4.0
I'm a bit perplexed on how to manage SmtpClient now that it is disposable, especially if I make calls using SendAsync. Presumably I should not call Dispose until SendAsync completes. But should I ever call it (e.g., using "using"). The scenario is a WCF service which mails out email periodically when calls are made. Most of the computation is fast, but the sending of email can take a second or so, so Async would be preferable.
Should I create a new SmtpClient each time I send mail? Should I create one for the entire WCF? Help!
Update In case it makes a difference, e开发者_运维知识库ach email is always customized to the user. The WCF is hosted on Azure and Gmail is used as the mailer.
The original question was asked for .NET 4, but if it helps as of .NET 4.5 SmtpClient implements async awaitable method
SendMailAsync
.
As a result, to send email asynchronously is as the following:
public async Task SendEmail(string toEmailAddress, string emailSubject, string emailMessage)
{
using (var message = new MailMessage())
{
message.To.Add(toEmailAddress);
message.Subject = emailSubject;
message.Body = emailMessage;
using (var smtpClient = new SmtpClient())
{
await smtpClient.SendMailAsync(message);
}
}
}
It's better to avoid using SendAsync method.
Note: .NET 4.5 SmtpClient implements async awaitable
method SendMailAsync
. For lower versions, use SendAsync
as described below.
You should always dispose of IDisposable
instances at the earliest possibility. In the case of async calls, this is on the callback after the message is sent.
var message = new MailMessage("from", "to", "subject", "body"))
var client = new SmtpClient("host");
client.SendCompleted += (s, e) => {
client.Dispose();
message.Dispose();
};
client.SendAsync(message, null);
It's a bit annoying the SendAsync
doesn't accept a callback.
In general, IDisposable objects should be disposed as soon as possible; implementing IDisposable on an object is intended to communicate the fact that the class in question holds expensive resources that should be deterministically released. However, if creating those resources is expensive and you need to construct a lot of these objects, it may be better (performance wise) to keep one instance in memory and reuse it. There's only one way to know if that makes any difference: profile it!
Re: disposing and Async: you can't use using
obviously. Instead you typically dispose the object in the SendCompleted event:
var smtpClient = new SmtpClient();
smtpClient.SendCompleted += (s, e) => smtpClient.Dispose();
smtpClient.SendAsync(...);
Ok, old question I know. But I stumbled upon this myself when I was in need of implementing something similar. I just wanted to share some code.
I'm iterating over several SmtpClients to send several mail asynchronously. My solution is similar to TheCodeKing, but I'm disposing the callback object instead. I'm also passing MailMessage as userToken to get it in the SendCompleted event so I can call dispose on that as well. Like this:
foreach (Customer customer in Customers)
{
SmtpClient smtpClient = new SmtpClient(); //SmtpClient configuration out of this scope
MailMessage message = new MailMessage(); //MailMessage configuration out of this scope
smtpClient.SendCompleted += (s, e) =>
{
SmtpClient callbackClient = s as SmtpClient;
MailMessage callbackMailMessage = e.UserState as MailMessage;
callbackClient.Dispose();
callbackMailMessage.Dispose();
};
smtpClient.SendAsync(message, message);
}
You can see why it is particularly important to dispose of SmtpClient by the following comment:
public class SmtpClient : IDisposable
// Summary:
// Sends a QUIT message to the SMTP server, gracefully ends the TCP connection,
// and releases all resources used by the current instance of the System.Net.Mail.SmtpClient
// class.
public void Dispose();
In my scenario sending multiple mails using Gmail without disposing the client, I used to get:
Message: Service not available, closing transmission channel. The server response was: 4.7.0 Temporary System Problem. Try again later (WS). oo3sm17830090pdb.64 - gsmtp
I used this way in asp.net 5.0 core.
public async Task EmailSend(MessageModel messageModel)
{
using (MailMessage mailMessage = new MailMessage())
{
mailMessage.From = new MailAddress(_configuration.GetSection("EmailConfiguration").GetSection("FromEmail").Value.ToString(), _configuration.GetSection("EmailConfiguration").GetSection("FromName").Value.ToString(), Encoding.UTF8);
mailMessage.Subject = messageModel.Subject;
mailMessage.SubjectEncoding = Encoding.UTF8;
mailMessage.Body = messageModel.Content;
mailMessage.BodyEncoding = Encoding.UTF8;
mailMessage.IsBodyHtml = true;
mailMessage.BodyTransferEncoding = TransferEncoding.Base64;
mailMessage.To.Add(new MailAddress(messageModel.To));
NetworkCredential networkCredential = new NetworkCredential(_configuration.GetSection("EmailConfiguration").GetSection("Username").Value.ToString(), _configuration.GetSection("EmailConfiguration").GetSection("Password").Value.ToString());
SmtpClient smtpClient = new SmtpClient();
smtpClient.Host = _configuration.GetSection("EmailConfiguration").GetSection("SmtpServer").Value.ToString();
smtpClient.EnableSsl = Convert.ToBoolean(_configuration.GetSection("EmailConfiguration").GetSection("SSL").Value);
smtpClient.UseDefaultCredentials = Convert.ToBoolean(_configuration.GetSection("EmailConfiguration").GetSection("UseDefaultCredentials").Value);
smtpClient.Port = Convert.ToInt32(_configuration.GetSection("EmailConfiguration").GetSection("Port").Value);
smtpClient.Credentials = networkCredential;
smtpClient.DeliveryMethod = SmtpDeliveryMethod.Network;
await smtpClient.SendMailAsync(mailMessage);
}
}
精彩评论