开发者

IEnumerable & Good Practices (& WCF)

Is it a good practice to use IEnumerable application-wide whenever you don't need to actually add or remove th开发者_如何学运维ings but only enumerate them?

Side question: Did you ever have any problems returning IEnumerable<T> from a WCF service? Can that cause problems to client applications? After all, I think that will be serialized to an array.


I tend to only return IEnumerable<T> when I want to hint to the caller that the implementation may use lazy evaluation. Otherwise, I'd usually return IList<T> or ICollection<T>, and implement as a ReadOnlyCollection<T> if the result should be readonly.

Lazy evaluation can be an important consideration: if your implementation can throw an exception, this won't be thrown until the caller starts enumerating the result. By returning IList<T> or ICollection<T>, you're guaranteeing that any exception will be thrown at the point the method is called.

In the case of a WCF method, returning IEnumerable<T> from a method that uses lazy evaluation means any exception might not be thrown until your response is being serialized - giving you less opportunity to handle it server-side.


I don't have any Good Practices sources, but i often tend to rely on List for my collections and it implements IEnumerable but i do pass it around as a List and not a IEnumerable, if i need it to be read only i rather pass a ReadOnlyCollection..


I don't like to return or accept IList<T> or List<T> because they implies the ability to modify a collection.

So prefer to return T[] as fixed-sized collection. Also array can be easily mapped to any other framework, platform, etc.

And prefer to accept IEnumerable<T> to emphasize that a method will enumerate that collection.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜