What is the best way to store pairs of strings, make an object or use a class in .NET?
Don't know whether I'm having a "thick day" - but I just wondered what is the best route here.
Context:
I have a list of fields and I want to store alias names with them (I'm usin开发者_如何学Gog .NET 2.0 BTW) e.g.
So its essentially a pair of strings:
REFERENCE, Ref
COMMUNITY, Community
POST_CODE, Zip Code
... and I'm thinking it seems overboard all the time to keep creating objects for things like this, so should I create a StringDictionary and store the values that way, even though I would not use any of the functionality of the StringDictionary class and I'm not bothered about a key value pair association etc - I just want to keep a pair of strings essentially.
Any help/pointers would be great.
The "pair" generic class for .NET is Tuple
. You would use it like:
var strings=new List<Tuple<string, string>>();
strings.Add(Tuple.Create("REFERENCE", "Ref"));
A dictionary is a perfectly acceptable substitute if the left-most string is unique (ie a key). You'll get errors otherwise.
As to whether it's better to use the built-in collections or create an actual object, depends on your needs (will you be adding more columns later on? you can't do that with a dictionary approach), how often you use it (if it's a core type, you should probably make a domain model for it) etc.
Edit: As to not using any dictionary built-in functionality, that's not true: you're using its binary search algorithm and internal tree construction for lightning-fast look-ups. A list of either Tuple
or your own type most likely won't have this and it will revert to a linear search.
How about System.Tuple?
You can use the generic Dictionary<string, string>
if your "Field Names" are unique.
Otherwise you could use the Lookup class if you don't mind duplicate keys.
I wouldn't worry too much about whether you use the full functionality of those classes or not. I think the more important concern should be to write simple, easy to read & maintain code.
what about Tuple<string,string>
? It's build into .net 4.0 and it's lightweight.
In my opinion, it is better to use a custom structure for storing two strings, because: System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary
and System.Collections.Specialized.NameValueCollection
require the method Add
to add strings into them – it's additional lines of code.
The class System.Tuple
has only ReadOnly properties – this can be an obstacle.
Example of simple structure:
public struct DoppelWert
{
public string Wert1;
public string Wert2;
}
For pairs of strings alternatively use NameValueCollection
Surprised, no one mentioned KeyValuePair? https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5tbh8a42(v=vs.110).aspx
Please note that if you are concerned about performance please have a look at this comparison http://www.dotnetperls.com/keyvaluepair
精彩评论