开发者

Inheritance doubts

I'm relatively new to OOP, so wanted to clear a few things,

I have the following piece of code

class Parent
{
     public Parent()
     {
           Console.WriteLine("Parent Class constructor");
     }

     public void Print()
     {
            Console.WriteLine("Parent->Print()");
     }
}

class Child : Parent
{
     public Child() 
     {
          Console.WriteLine("Child class constructor");
     }

     public static void Main()
     {
           Child ChildObject = new Child();
          开发者_如何转开发 Parent ParentObject = new Child();

           ChildObject.Print();
           ParentObject.Print();
     }

}

Output :

Parent Class Constructor
Child Class constructor

Parent Class Constructor
Child Class constructor

Parent->Print()
Parent->Print()

My questions are as follows :

1) Why is the base class constructor called when I instantiate objects with the ChildClass constructor? without explicitly specifying the base keyword. Is there any way to avoid calling the base class constructor?

2) why is ParentClass ParentObj = new ChildClass(); possible? and not the other way round.


  1. All base class constructors all the way up inheritance tree will get called. Constructors are always chained starting with the parent class on down to the most derived class.

  2. Instances of ChildClass "are" instances of ParentClass. They model an "is-a" relationship, but not the other way around.


In a word, polymorphism.

By Child inheriting Parent, the child object takes on the characteristics of the parent. If you think of it in genetic terms, it may make more sense.

1) Why is the base class constructor called when I instantiate objects with the ChildClass constructor? without explicitly specifying the base keyword. Is there any way to avoid calling the base class constructor?

There is no way to get around the base class constructor being called (that I am aware of). The point of having the base class constructor called is to instantiate the base class (pass parameters, initialize other objects, assign values, etc.)

2) why is ParentClass ParentObj = new ChildClass(); possible? and not the other way round.

Because of polymorhism, Child looks like Parent and therefore may be instantiated as Parent. Since Parent does not inherit Child, Parent does not look like Child and therefore may not be instantiated as Child.

For what it's worth, using Parent and Child have different meanings. Typically, when referring to inheritance, Parent is the base class, where Child would be the derived or sub-type.


  1. Because the compilator inserts : base() if you don't specify otherwise.
    You can explicitly call : base("foo") if you have a constructor Parent(string s), then Parent() is not called. You can not skip the base class constructor calling all together.
  2. Because Animal animal = new Dog(); makes sense and not Dog dog = new Animal(); A dog is always an animal, but not necessarily the other way around.


1) Probably confusing because you are using Child/Parent nomenclature. Because Child/Parent implies two different instances (an owner relationship). Inheritance is an Is-A relationship. A dog is an animal. So a dog class could inherit from animal.

2) Again, you can have an animal which happens to be a dog, but you only have an animal handle on it. Like you could be holding a leash and it could have an elephant or a flea on the other end, but a leash can hold any animal.


1) There are (or could be) private members in the base class which the child class knows nothing about, but are necessary. Hence the parent constructor is called first to cover this eventuality.

2) ChildClass is a type of ParentClass as Square is a type of Rectangle. That's the theory, anyway. That's why it doesn't make sense to have it the other way around.


1) In C#, if you don't specify a call to a different constructor using something like base(blah), it will call the default constructor. Which you've defined above.

2) Every ChildClass will always be a ParentClass. However, there may be objects that are a ParentClass but are not a ChildClass. For example, if you had an OtherChildClass : ParentClass, it would be a ParentClass, but it would not be a ChildClass.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜