Using hibernate with generics
I am having some trouble understanding how Hibernate deals with generics and was wondering the best way to accomplish my goal.
Given a simple generic entity:
@Entity
public class Box<T>{
private T t;
@Id
private long id;
public void setT(T t) {
this.t = t;
}
public T getT() {
return t;
}
public void setId(long id) {
this.id = id;
}
public long getId() {
return id;
}
}
When going through hibernate initialization, I am getting the exception: ...has an unbound type and no explicit target entity. Resolve this Generic usage issue or set an explicit target attribute (eg @OneToMany(target=) or use an explicit @Type
I am nearly certain this is because I haven't given hibernate a list of restrictions of what <T>
can actually be. 开发者_开发百科 I know you can specify things such as targetEntity=String.class
above t
in an annotation, but then you lose the flexibility of having generics. Can I limit the scope of what is an acceptable generic using annotations? For instance: What if I want classes ChildA
, ChildB
, whom inherit from an abstract class Parent
to be persistable there. In addition, it should also be able to accept String
s. Can Hibernate
deal with such a thing?
What you're looking for is probably Hibernate's implicit polymorphism. There's also a little-known "any" relationship which gives complete flexibility, but it has its tradeoffs. You can also use an "any" in a many-to-any.
Edit: I've created a runnable example on Github based around your "Box" class and using an @Any
mapping. You can browse it (or the Box class specifically) or check it out and run it with
git clone git://github.com/zzantozz/testbed tmp
cd tmp
mvn -q compile exec:java -Dexec.mainClass=rds.hibernate.AnyMapping -pl hibernate-any
I've already done that but with subclasses.
Your generic class must be abstract and subclasses must define the generic parameter
精彩评论