开发者

do record_info and tuple_to_list return the same key order in Erlang?

I.e, if I have a record

-record(one, {frag, left}).
  • Is record_info(fields, one) going to always return [frag, left]?
  • Is tl(tuple_to_list(#one{frag = "开发者_StackOverflow社区Frag", left = "Left"})) always gonna be ["Frag", "Left"]?

Is this an implementation detail? Thanks a lot!


The short answer is: yes, as of this writing it will work. The better answer is: it may not work that way in the future, and the nature of the question concerns me.

It's safe to use record_info/2, although relying on the order may be risky and frankly I can't think of a situation where doing so makes sense which implies that you are solving a problem the wrong way. Can you share more details about what exactly you are trying to accomplish so we can help you choose a better method? It could be that simple pattern matching is all you need.

As for the example with tuple_to_list/1, I'll quote from "Erlang Programming" by Cesarini and Thompson:

"... whatever you do, never, ever use the tuple representations of records in your programs. If you do, the authors of this book will disown you and deny any involvement in helping you learn Erlang."

There are several good reasons why, including:

  1. Your code will become brittle - if you later change the number of fields or their order, your code will break.
  2. There is no guarantee that the internal representation of records will continue to work this way in future versions of erlang.


Yes, order is always the same because records represented by tuples for which order is an essential property. Look also on my other answer about records with examples: Syntax Error while accessing a field in a record


Yes, in both cases Erlang will retain the 'original' order. And yes it's implementation as it's not specifically addressed in the function spec or documentation, though it's a pretty safe bet it will stay like that.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜