开发者

Getting baseclass property value using reflection - base.Property as opposed to this.Property

I want to know if something like this is possible: I've overriden a property of a base class, which is auto-implemented. I've supplied logic in the override to resolve "missing"开发者_如何学Python properties against default settings.

Now, I want to use reflection to check whether the default value is used or some "actual" value. In other words, I need to check if base.Property is null, but by using reflection. This doesn't work, it simply gets the sub-class value (which is resolved against defaults, so not null).

var property = this.GetType().GetProperty(e.PropertyName);
if(property.GetValue(this, null) == null))
    OnPropertyChanged(e.PropertyName);

Also tried:

var property = this.GetType().BaseType.GetProperty(e.PropertyName);
if(property.GetValue(this, null) == null))
    OnPropertyChanged(e.PropertyName);

Is it possible using reflection to access the base class value?

UPDATE:

Following advice from comments, I tried the following, just for kicks.

var method1 = this.GetType().BaseType.GetMethods().First(x => x.Name.Contains(e.PropertyName));
var method = this.GetType().BaseType.GetProperty(e.PropertyName).GetGetMethod();
var methodValue = method1.Invoke(this, null);

Both of these still return the "derived" value, while at the same time base.Property returns null.


It is possible, although as far as I know there's no way to do it without emitting your own IL, basically using the call instruction rather than callvirt.

Note that if you need to go to these lengths to make your design work then that's a sign that you're probably doing something wrong somewhere!

Anyway, here's a contrived example. (Error-checking etc omitted for brevity.)

var derived = new DerivedClass();
Console.WriteLine(derived.GetBaseProperty("Prop"));    // displays "BaseProp"

// ...

public class BaseClass
{
    public virtual string Prop { get; set;}
}

public class DerivedClass : BaseClass
{
    public override string Prop { get; set;}

    public DerivedClass()
    {
        base.Prop = "BaseProp";
        this.Prop = "DerivedProp";
    }

    public object GetBaseProperty(string propName)
    {
        Type t = this.GetType();
        MethodInfo mi = t.BaseType.GetProperty(propName).GetGetMethod();

        var dm = new DynamicMethod("getBase_" + propName, typeof(object), new[] { typeof(object) }, t);

        ILGenerator il = dm.GetILGenerator();
        il.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0);
        il.Emit(OpCodes.Call, mi);
        if (mi.ReturnType.IsValueType) il.Emit(OpCodes.Box, mi.ReturnType);
        il.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);

        var getBase = (Func<object, object>)dm.CreateDelegate(typeof(Func<object, object>));
        return getBase(this);
    }
}


AFAIK I think it is not possible. The real type of the object is the derived type, and by definition of virtual methods, no matter through which type instance (actual type or base type) you call a method, you will get the overriden implementation.

Having this work any other way would be, at least to me, unexpected behavior.

EDIT: I have tried the following to see if it is actually possible to get to the base implentation:

Type baseType = this.GetType().BaseType;
var methodInfo = baseType.GetMethod("Foo");
string foo = methodInfo.Invoke(this, null); //Derived type implementation

This means that even calling the method through the base type MethodInfo reflection is able to resolve the override and will return the derived implementation. So I think what you are trying is not possible through reflection or at least I can not see a way to do it.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜