Sort a map on key and value
I want to sort a Map on key and value. First on key then on value. For example, this should be the result;
开发者_开发知识库1,2
1,3
2,1
2,2
Anyone has a suggestion on how to achieve this effectively? I've been seeing people using a TreeMap to sort keys, however i also need values.
Or ofcouse any other method of sorting pairs on key and value is welcome.
import java.util.SortedSet;
import java.util.TreeSet;
public class SortMapOnKeyAndValue {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SortedSet<KeyValuePair> sortedSet = new TreeSet<KeyValuePair>();
sortedSet.add(new KeyValuePair(1, 2));
sortedSet.add(new KeyValuePair(2, 2));
sortedSet.add(new KeyValuePair(1, 3));
sortedSet.add(new KeyValuePair(2, 1));
for (KeyValuePair keyValuePair : sortedSet) {
System.out.println(keyValuePair.key+","+keyValuePair.value);
}
}
}
class KeyValuePair implements Comparable<KeyValuePair>{
int key, value;
public KeyValuePair(int key, int value) {
super();
this.key = key;
this.value = value;
}
public int compareTo(KeyValuePair o) {
return key==o.key?value-o.value:key-o.key;
}
}
What you are looking for a is SortedSetMultimap
, part of Google's Guava library. The implementation they include is named TreeMultimap
:
http://docs.guava-libraries.googlecode.com/git-history/release/javadoc/com/google/common/collect/TreeMultimap.html
If you're not familiar with it, Guava is a fantastic library with lots of great stuff that you sometimes think should be in the standard Java libraries. I think Java 8, actually, will include some stuff from Guava (at least that seemed to me to be the drift of this item: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/108).
Sounds like you want a multi map of some type e.g.
SortedMap<Key, SortedSet<Value>> map = new TreeMap<Key, SortedSet<Value>>();
map.put(1, new TreeSet<Integer>(Arrays.asList(1, 2)));
map.put(2, new TreeSet<Integer>(Arrays.asList(2, 1)));
System.out.println(map);
prints
{ 1 = {1, 2}, 2 = {1, 2}}
The other answers have indicated the problem with duplicate keys, but I am guessing you have pairs that you want to sort and the Map bit was just a mistake. The cleanest solution I can think of is to create a custom Pair class which implements Comparator and compares both the key and the value of two Pairs. You can then use Collections.sort to sort this.
If you are willing to take the risk, you could use the constructor that allows you to specify a Comparator: http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/TreeMap.html#TreeMap%28java.util.Comparator%29
Having said that, what you want to do is ugly as hell and illegal because: * the order will not be consistent with equals(), which is a requisite for SortedSet) * the order may change due to altering values in the Map, and I don't know if its implementation allows for this.
I think that you need something else. Perhaps you would be better by creating an object that has both key and value and properly implements equals(), hashcode() and Comparable, and use a SortedSet with it.
EDIT: I have answered the generic question (sort a map on key and value) without looking at your samples. As others have written, you cannot have duplicate keys in a map.
It is not possible, because a map cannot contain duplicate keys. A TreeMap
is always sorted by key value (assuming, the key type is Comparable
).
But for those task we usually take a map whose values are lists:
Map<Integer, List<Integer>> map = new TreeMap<Integer, List<Integer>>();
// add some values in random order
List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
list.add(2);
list.add(1);
map.put(2,list);
list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
list.add(2);
list.add(1);
map.put(1,list);
// result
for (Integer key:map.keySet()) { // map is already sorted
List<Integer> value = map.get(key);
Collections.sort(value); // list of values needs sorting
for (Integer innerValue:value) {
System.out.printf("%s : %s%n", key, innerValue);
}
}
The overall idea is, convert the Map into List, sort the List and put the sorted list back to a Map.
Map ---> List ---> Sort ---> Map
Example
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.LinkedHashMap;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
public class SortMyMap{
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Unsort Map......");
Map<String,String> unsortMap = new HashMap<String,String>();
unsortMap.put("1", "1");
unsortMap.put("2", "A");
unsortMap.put("3", "2");
Iterator iterator=unsortMap.entrySet().iterator();
for (Map.Entry entry : unsortMap.entrySet()) {
System.out.println("Key : " + entry.getKey()
+ " Value : " + entry.getValue());
}
System.out.println("Sorted Map......");
Map<String,String> sortedMap = sortByComparator(unsortMap);
for (Map.Entry entry : sortedMap.entrySet()) {
System.out.println("Key : " + entry.getKey()
+ " Value : " + entry.getValue());
}
}
private static Map sortByComparator(Map unsortMap) {
List list = new LinkedList(unsortMap.entrySet());
//sort list based on comparator
Collections.sort(list, new Comparator() {
public int compare(Object o1, Object o2) {
return ((Comparable) ((Map.Entry) (o1)).getValue())
.compareTo(((Map.Entry) (o2)).getValue());
}
});
//put sorted list into map again
Map sortedMap = new LinkedHashMap();
for (Iterator it = list.iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
Map.Entry entry = (Map.Entry)it.next();
sortedMap.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}
return sortedMap;
}
}
Please follow this code :- This code will first sort the map by Key and then by value. Just write a main method and call this method as follow :-
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
public class SortMapByKeyAndValue
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
aMapSortProgramByKeyAndValue();
}
private static void aMapSortProgramByKeyAndValue()
{
Map<String, Integer> myMap = new HashMap<String, Integer>();
// putting values in the Map
myMap.put("Jayant", 80);
myMap.put("Abhishek", 90);
myMap.put("Anushka", 80);
myMap.put("Amit", 75);
myMap.put("Spandan", 50);
myMap.put("Hari", 55);
myMap.put("Keshav", 60);
System.out.println("Map data without Sort :-");
for (Entry<String, Integer> myEntryMapData : myMap.entrySet())
{
System.out.println("The Map data is Key: " + myEntryMapData.getKey() + " Value: "
+ myEntryMapData.getValue());
}
List<Entry<String, Integer>> myMapDataAsList = new ArrayList<Map.Entry<String, Integer>>();
myMapDataAsList.addAll(myMap.entrySet());
System.out.println("Map data Stored in List, The whole List is : " + myMapDataAsList);
Iterator<Entry<String, Integer>> myListIterator = myMapDataAsList.iterator();
System.out.println("Map data Stored in List, Print through iterator :-");
for (; myListIterator.hasNext();)
{
Entry<String, Integer> myListData = myListIterator.next();
System.out.println("The List data is Key: " + myListData.getKey() + " Value: " + myListData.getValue());
}
Collections.sort(myMapDataAsList, new Comparator<Entry<String, Integer>>()
{
@Override
public int compare(Entry<String, Integer> dataOne, Entry<String, Integer> dataTwo)
{
return dataOne.getKey().compareTo(dataTwo.getKey());
}
});
System.out.println("After Sort by the Key the Map data is : ");
myListIterator = myMapDataAsList.iterator();
for (; myListIterator.hasNext();)
{
Entry<String, Integer> myListData = myListIterator.next();
System.out.println("The List data is Key: " + myListData.getKey() + " Value: " + myListData.getValue());
}
Collections.sort(myMapDataAsList, new Comparator<Entry<String, Integer>>()
{
@Override
public int compare(Entry<String, Integer> dataOne, Entry<String, Integer> dataTwo)
{
return dataOne.getValue().compareTo(dataTwo.getValue());
}
});
System.out.println("After Sort by the vale the Map data is : ");
myListIterator = myMapDataAsList.iterator();
for (; myListIterator.hasNext();)
{
Entry<String, Integer> myListData = myListIterator.next();
System.out.println("The List data is Key: " + myListData.getKey() + " Value: " + myListData.getValue());
}
}
}
you can't have such map
1->11
1->21
the key '1' is common so 21 will replace 11
精彩评论