Doubt in usage of *++p in printf

int main(){
    int a[3]={1,10,20};
    int *p=a;
    printf("%d %d " ,*++p,*p);
    return 0;
}

The output to the code above is 10 1 on a g开发者_如何学Gocc compiler.

I understand that *++p increments p and dereferences the new value. But since p has been incremented, why does *p return 1 instead of 10?

It's unspecified behaviour in what order function argument expressions are evaluated. Some compilers might use left-to-right, some right-to-left, and some might do a different evaluation order depending on the situation for optimalization. So in your case *p gets evaluated before *++p which results in your "weird output".

The comma between *++p and *p does not denote a sequence point, so this is undefined unspecified behavior. The compiler is free to evaluate *p before *++p.

Undefined behaviour, output may various on different compiler.

Apparently, your arguments are being evaluated in reverse order (last to first) so *p is evaluated first and it will return 1.

As others have pointed out, the standard does not dictate what order the arguments are evaluated and so this behavior may or may not look the same with other compilers.