开发者

When to use "validates_associated" v "validate => true"

It seems that in rail开发者_运维技巧s you can define association validations in two places, either on the association itself:

class Child

  belongs_to :parent, :validate => true

end

Or as a validation callback:

class Child

  belongs_to :parent

  validates_associated :parent

end

What is the difference between these two methods?

Testing the difference

I thought that maybe the former creates a backpressure and enforces that the parent is only valid if the child is valid:

i.e. (when setting :validate => true)

child.valid? # => false
child.parent.valid? # => also evaluates to false because of the :validate => true condition


# do whatever it takes to make the child valid again
#...
child.valid? # => true
child.parent.valid? # => true

However I tested it and this doesn't happen. So what's the difference (if any) between the two methods?


I had to dig into the Rails (3.0.7) code to find some differences. The core functionality looks the same to me -- they both seem to call valid? on the associated record(s).

The key differences that I did find only appear when using the :autosave feature or when either destroying the associated object or marking it for destruction. For example, I have:

class AbsentDate < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :user, :autosave => true, :validate => true
end

And I see the following behaviour:

user = User.new(:username => "Jimmy")
user.valid?                               # => true
ad = AbsentDate.new(:user => user)
user.username = nil                          
user.valid?                               # => false
ad.valid?                                 # => false
ad.errors.full_messages                   # => ["User username cannot be empty"]
ad.user.mark_for_destruction
ad.valid?                                 # => true

Note that marking the user for destruction resulted in a valid AbsentDate. Also note that there is only one error message. Now consider this case:

class AbsentDate < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :user, :autosave => true
  validates_associated :user
end

This is what I see happening:

user = User.new(:username => "Jimmy")
user.valid?                                # => true
ad = AbsentDate.new(:user => user)
user.username = nil
user.valid?                                # => false
ad.valid?                                  # => false
ad.errors.full_messages                    # => ["User username cannot be empty", "User is invalid"]
ad.user.mark_for_destruction
ad.valid?                                  # => false

Two error messages this time, and the AbsentDate is still false even though its user has been marked for destruction. I was able to replicate these results by calling destroy instead of mark_for_destruction.

One last thing: if you use validates_associated, you get several options (:if, :unless, :on, :message) that you won't have if you use the flag on belongs_to.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜