开发者

Should a class with a Thread member implement IDisposable?

Let's say I have this class Logger that is logging strings in a low-priority worker thread, which isn't a background thread. Strings are queued in Logger.WriteLine and munched in Logger.Worker. No queued strings are allowed to be lost. Roughly like this (implementation, locking, synchronizing, etc. omitted for clarity):

public class Logger
{
    private Thread workerThread;
    private Queue<String> logTexts;
    private AutoResetEvent logEvent;
    private AutoResetEvent stop开发者_StackOverflow社区Event;

    // Locks the queue, adds the text to it and sets the log event.
    public void WriteLine(String text);

    // Sets the stop event without waiting for the thread to stop.
    public void AsyncStop();

    // Waits for any of the log event or stop event to be signalled.
    // If log event is set, it locks the queue, grabs the texts and logs them.
    // If stop event is set, it exits the function and the thread.
    private void Worker();
}

Since the worker thread is a foreground thread, I have to be able to deterministically stop it if the process should be able to finish.

Question: Is the general recommendation in this scenario to let Logger implement IDisposable and stop the worker thread in Dispose()? Something like this:

public class Logger : IDisposable
{
    ...

    public void Dispose()
    {
        AsyncStop();
        this.workerThread.Join();
    }
}

Or are there better ways of handling it?


That would certainly work - a Thread qualifies as a resource, etc. The main benefit of IDisposable comes from the using statement, so it really depends on whether the typical use for the owner of the object is to use the object for a duration of time in a single method - i.e.

void Foo() {
    ...
    using(var obj = YourObject()) {
        ... some loop?
    }
    ...
}

If that makes sense (perhaps a work pump), then fine; IDisposable would be helpful for the case when an exception is thrown. If that isn't the typical use then other than highlighting that it needs some kind of cleanup, it isn't quite so helpful.


That's usually the best, as long as you have a deterministic way to dispose the logger (using block on the main part of the app, try/finally, shutdown handler, etc).


It may be a good idea to have the thread hold a WeakReference to the managing object, and periodically check to ensure that it still exists. In theory, you could use a finalizer to nudge your thread (note that the finalizer, unlike the Dispose, should not do a Thread.Join), but it may be a good idea to allow for the possibility of the finalizer failing.


You should be aware that if user doesn't call Dispose manually (via using or otherwise) application will never exit, as Thread object will hold strong reference to your Logger. Answer provided by supercat is much better general solution to this problem.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜