Batch with Multiple GroupBy

I have a CSV file with records that need to be sorted and then grouped into arbitrary-sized batches (e.g. 300 max records per batch). Each batch might have less than 300 records, because the contents of each batch must be homogenious (based on the contents of a couple different columns).

My LINQ statement, inspired by this answer on batching with LINQ, looks like this:

var query = (from line in EbrRecords
            let EbrData = line.Split('\t')
            let Location = EbrData[7]
            let RepName = EbrData[4]
            let AccountID = EbrData[0]
            orderby Location, RepName, AccountID).
            Select((data, index) => new {
                Record = new EbrRecord(
                AccountID = EbrData[0],
                AccountName = EbrData[1],
                MBSegment = EbrData[2],
                RepName = EbrData[4],
                Location = EbrData[7],
                TsrLocation = EbrData[8]
                )
                ,
                Index = index}
                ).GroupBy(x => new {x.Record.Location, x.Record.RepName, batch = x.Index / 100});    

The "/ 100" gives me the arbitrary bucket size. The other elements of the groupby are intended to achieve the homogenaity between batches. I suspect this is almost what I want, but it gives me the following compiler error: A query body must end with a select clause or a group clause. I understand why I'm recieving the error, but overall I'm not sure how to fix this query. How would it be done?

UPDATE I very nearly achieved what I'm after, with the following:

List<EbrRecord> input = new List<EbrRecord> {
    new EbrRecord {Name = "Brent",Age = 20,ID = "A"},
    new EbrRecord {Name = "Amy",Age = 20,ID = "B"},
    new EbrRecord {Name = "Gabe",Age = 23,ID = "B"},
    new EbrRecord {Name = "Noah",Age = 27,ID = "B"},
    new EbrRecord {Name = "Alex",Age = 27,ID = "B"},
    new EbrRecord {Name = "Stormi",Age = 27,ID = "B"},
    new EbrRecord {Name = "Roger",Age = 27,ID = "B"},
    new EbrRecord {Name = "Jen",Age = 27,ID = "B"},
    new EbrRecord {Name = "Adrian",Age = 28,ID = "B"},
    new EbrRecord {Name = "Cory",Age = 29,ID = "C"},
    new EbrRecord {Name = "Bob",Age = 29,ID = "C"},
    new EbrRecord {Name = "George",Age = 29,ID = "C"},
    };

//look how tiny this query is, and it is very nearly the result I want!!!
int i = 0;
var result = from q in input
                orderby q.Age, q.ID
                group q by new { q.ID, batch = i++ / 3 };

foreach (var agroup in result)
{
    Debug.WriteLine("ID:" + agroup.Key);
    foreach (var record in agroup)
    {
        Debug.WriteLine(" Name:" + record.Name);
    }
}

The trick here is to bypass the select "index position" overlaod, by using a closure variable (int i in this case). The output results are as follows:

ID:{ ID = A, batch = 0 }
 Name:Brent
ID:{ ID = B, batch = 0 }
 Name:Amy
 Name:Gabe
ID:{ ID = B, batch = 1 }
 Name:Noah
 Name:Alex
 Name:Stormi
ID:{ ID = B, batch = 2 }
 Name:Roger
 Name:Jen
 Name:Adrian
ID:{ ID = C, batch = 3 }
 Name:Cory
 Name:Bob
 Name:George

While this answer is acceptable, it is just a fraction short of the ideal result. It should be that the first occurance of "batch 'B'" should have 3 entires in it (Amy, Gabe, Noah) - not two (Amy, Gabe). This is because the index position is not being reset when each group is identified. Anyone know how to reset my custom index position for each group?

UPDATE 2 I think开发者_如何学Go I may have found an answer. First, make an additional function like this:

    public static bool BatchGroup(string ID, ref string priorID )
    {
        if (priorID != ID)
        {
            priorID = ID;
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }

Second, update the LINQ query like this:

int i = 0;
string priorID = null;
var result = from q in input
                orderby q.Age, q.ID
             group q by new { q.ID, batch = (BatchGroup(q.ID, ref priorID) ? i=0 : ++i) / 3 };

Now it does what I want. I just wish i did not need that separate function!

Does this work?

var query = (from line in EbrRecords
        let EbrData = line.Split('\t')
        let Location = EbrData[7]
        let RepName = EbrData[4]
        let AccountID = EbrData[0]
        orderby Location, RepName, AccountID
        select new EbrRecord(
                AccountID = EbrData[0],
                AccountName = EbrData[1],
                MBSegment = EbrData[2],
                RepName = EbrData[4],
                Location = EbrData[7],
                TsrLocation = EbrData[8])
        ).Select((data, index) => new
        {
            Record = data,
            Index = index
        })
        .GroupBy(x => new {x.Record.Location, x.Record.RepName, batch = x.Index / 100},
            x => x.Record);

orderby Location, RepName, AccountID

There needs to be a select clause after the above, as demonstrated in StriplingWarrior's answer. Linq Comprehension Queries must end with select or group by.

Unfortunately, there is a logical defect... Suppose I have 50 accounts in the first group and 100 accounts in the second group with a batch size of 100. The original code will produce 3 batches of size 50, not 2 batches of 50, 100.

Here's one way to fix it.

IEnumerable<IGrouping<int, EbrRecord>> query = ...

  orderby Location, RepName, AccountID
  select new EbrRecord(
    AccountID = EbrData[0],
    AccountName = EbrData[1],
    MBSegment = EbrData[2],
    RepName = EbrData[4],
    Location = EbrData[7],
    TsrLocation = EbrData[8]) into x
  group x by new {Location = x.Location, RepName = x.RepName} into g
  from g2 in g.Select((data, index) => new Record = data, Index = index })
              .GroupBy(y => y.Index/100, y => y.Record)
  select g2;


List<List<EbrRecord>> result = query.Select(g => g.ToList()).ToList();

Also note that using GroupBy to batch is very slow due to redundant iterations. You can write a for loop that will do it in one pass over the ordered set and that loop will run much faster than the LinqToObjects.