开发者

Iterating Variadic Macro Arguments

I am programmatically generating bunch of functors, in order to keep the generated code more readable I am trying to come up with a macro that will expand line the following,

SET_STATE(FunctorA,a,b);

ref a;
ref b;
FunctorA(ref a, ref b){
   this->a = a;
   this->b = b;
}

Basically it will expand to the first arguments constructor. Variadic part is the number of arguments to the constructor. is it possible 开发者_StackOverflowto loop inside the macro and generate this code during preprocessing even though it does not make sense for this particular case but I have some functors that have 20 or so variables that they have access to it will cleanup my generated code a lot.

All arguments will be of the same type, only names will differ.


If boost::preprocessor and SEQ representation((a)(b)...) are allowed, probably the following code will meet the purpose:

#include <boost/preprocessor/seq/for_each.hpp>
#include <boost/preprocessor/seq/for_each_i.hpp>
#include <boost/preprocessor/punctuation/comma_if.hpp>

#define DEF_MEMBER( r, data, elem ) ref elem;
#define DEF_PARAM( r, data, i, elem ) BOOST_PP_COMMA_IF( i ) ref elem
#define DEF_ASSIGN( r, data, elem ) this->elem = elem;

#define SET_STATE( f, members )                         \
  BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH( DEF_MEMBER,, members )         \
  f( BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH_I( DEF_PARAM,, members ) ) { \
      BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH( DEF_ASSIGN,, members )     \
  }

SET_STATE(FunctorA,(a)(b))

The above code is expanded to

ref a; ref b; FunctorA( ref a , ref b ) { this->a = a; this->b = b; }

in my environment.


Using the tricked found in this link http://cplusplus.co.il/2010/07/17/variadic-macro-to-count-number-of-arguments/ to count the number of arguments and using some really ugly macro I can generate the output you wanted.

I tested it using gcc (gcc -E test.cpp) and it works, It's not portable.

Code:

#define VA_NARGS_IMPL(_1,_2,_3,_4,_5,_6,_7,_8,N,...) N
#define VA_NARGS(...) VA_NARGS_IMPL(__VA_ARGS__, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
#define SET_STATEGENERATE(name, count, ...)             \
        dec ## count (__VA_ARGS__)                      \
        name(ref ## count (__VA_ARGS__)) {              \
            con ## count (__VA_ARGS__)                  \
        }
#define SET_STATEP(name, count, ...) SET_STATEGENERATE(name, count, __VA_ARGS__) 
#define SET_STATE(name, ...) SET_STATEP(name, VA_NARGS(__VA_ARGS__), __VA_ARGS__)
/* args */
#define dec1(a) ref a;
#define dec2(a,b) dec1(a) ref b;
#define dec3(a,b,c) dec2(a, b) ref c;
#define dec4(a,b,c,d) dec3(a,b,c) ref d;
#define dec5(a,b,c,d,e) dec4(a,b,c,d) ref e;
#define dec6(a,b,c,d,e,f) dec5(a,b,c,d,e) ref f;
#define dec7(a,b,c,d,e,f,g) dec6(a,b,c,d,e,f)ref g;
#define dec8(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h) dec7(a,b,c,d,e,f,g) ref h;
#define ref1(a) ref a
#define ref2(a,b) ref1(a), ref b
#define ref3(a,b,c) ref2(a,b), ref c
#define ref4(a,b,c,d) ref3(a,b,c), ref d
#define ref5(a,b,c,d,e) ref4(a,b,c,d), ref e
#define ref6(a,b,c,d,e,f) ref5(a,b,c,d,e), ref f
#define ref7(a,b,c,d,e,f,g) ref6(a,b,c,d,e,f), ref g
#define ref8(a,b,c,d,e,f,g, h) ref7(a,b,c,d,e,f,g), ref h
#define con1(a) this->a = a;
#define con2(a,b) con1(a) this->b = b;
#define con3(a,b,c) con2(a,b) this->c = c;
#define con4(a,b,c,d) con3(a,b,c) this->d = d;
#define con5(a,b,c,d,e) con4(a,b,c,d) this->e = e;
#define con6(a,b,c,d,e,f) con5(a,b,c,d,e) this->f = f;
#define con7(a,b,c,d,e,f,g) con6(a,b,c,d,e,f) this->g = g;
#define con8(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h) con7(a,b,c,d,e,f,g) this->h = h;

So the following:

/* 2 args */
SET_STATE(FunctorAA, foo, bar)
/* 3 args */
SET_STATE(FunctorBB, foo, bar, baz)
/* 4 args */    
SET_STATE(FunctorCC, foo, bar, baz, qux)

will produce:

ref foo; ref bar; FunctorAA(ref foo, ref bar) { this->foo = foo; this->bar = bar; }
ref foo; ref bar; ref baz; FunctorBB(ref foo, ref bar, ref baz) { this->foo = foo; this->bar = bar; this->baz = baz; }
ref foo; ref bar; ref baz; ref qux; FunctorCC(ref foo, ref bar, ref baz, ref qux) { this->foo = foo; this->bar = bar; this->baz = baz; this->qux = qux; }

Note: you can continue the number of arguments following the obvious pattern.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜