Resharper says I shouldn't use List<T>
I have a method:
static void FileChangesDetected(List<ChangedFiles> files)
I used Visual Studio 2010 and Resharper. Resharper always recommends that I change the List<T>
to IEnumerable<T>
, and I'm wondering why this is.
In the method, I simply do this:
f开发者_如何转开发oreach (var file in files)
{ ... }
Is there a benefit of using IEnumerable<T>
rather than List<T>
?
It all has to do with LSP (Liskov substitution principle).
Basically, instead of using implementations, it is better to code to abstractions.
In this specific case, if all you do is loop over the list, you can use IEnumerable<T>
as the simplest abstraction - this way you don't have to use a List<T>
, but any collection type in your function.
This allows your functions to be more reusable and reduces coupling.
Resharper suggests that your method doesn't need really require List<T>
as a parameter and can easily work with IEnumerable<T>
. Which means that you can make you method more generic.
If you are just iterating of your files
, then it does not have to be a List<>. Your code would also work with an array. Or more general: It will work with anything you can iterate over. That's expressed by IEnumerable<>. So the usage of List<> restricts the usage of you message without any need. The ReSharper method is just a hint for that.
Because in your code, you only use the fact that files
is an IEnumerable<ChangedFiles>
, you don't use for example Count, nor Add.
Even if later on, you want to use List specific methods (with Add or Count methods), it's always better to use an interface: IList<ChangedFiles>
instead of a concrete implementation.
You will still be able to the foreach even if you change it to
IEnumerable<ChangedFiles>
or
ICollection<ChangedFiles>
精彩评论