开发者

What's the most efficient way to iterate through an entire table using Datamapper?

What's the most efficient way to iterate through an entire table using Datamapper?

If I do this, does Datamapper try to pull the entire result set into memory before performing the iteration? Assume, for the sake of argument, that I have millions of records and that this is infeasible:

Author.all.each do |a|
  puts a.title
end

Is there a way开发者_如何学运维 that I can tell Datamapper to load the results in chunks? Is it smart enough to know to do this automatically?


Thanks, Nicolas, I actually came up with a similar solution. I've accepted your answer since it makes use of Datamapper's dm-pagination system, but I'm wondering if this would do equally as well (or worse):

while authors = Author.slice(offset, CHUNK) do
  authors.each do |a|
    # do something with a
  end
  offset += CHUNK
end


Datamapper will run just one sql query for the example above so it will have to keep the whole result set in memory.

I think you should use some sort of pagination if your collection is big. Using dm-pagination you could do something like:

PAGE_SIZE = 20
pager = Author.page(:per_page => PAGE_SIZE).pager # This will run a count query
(1..pager.total_pages).each do |page_number|
  Author.page(:per_page => PAGE_SIZE, :page => page_number).each do |a|
    puts a.title
  end
end

You can play around with different values for PAGE_SIZE to find a good trade-off between the number of sql queries and memory usage.


What you want is the dm-chunked_query plugin: (example from the docs)

require 'dm-chunked_query'

MyModel.each_chunk(20) do |chunk|
  chunk.each do |resource|
    # ...
  end
end

This will allow you to iterate over all the records in the model, in chunks of 20 records at a time.

EDIT: the example above had an extra #each after #each_chunk, and it was unnecessary. The gem author updated the README example, and I changed the above code to match.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜