开发者

questions about virtual function in c++

I am a beginner of C++, I am studying virtual func开发者_如何转开发tions these days. There are some questions confuse me a lot.

for example:

class A {
  public:
  virtual void f() {
      //do something; 
  }
}

class B: public A {
   public:
   virtual void f() {
//do something;
}
}
  1. class A contains a virtual function f(), and class B inherits it. Inside class B, the function f() is also declared as virtual, so does this mean f() in class B overloads f() in class A? Does it allow classes which inherit B to overload f()? Or does B define a new virtual function which is different from f() in class A?

  2. Virtual functions provide a way of overloading methods. If B inherits A and does not declare the f() as virtual, then can a class C which inherits B overload the f() and achieve polymorphism?


inside class B, the function f() also be declared as virtual, so does this mean f() in class B overload f() in class A

No, it doesn't overload. It overrides. Also the keyword virtual is optional in class B. B::f() will always be a virtual function, whether you write virtual or not.

The term overload is used when you define a function with same name but different parameter(s). In your case, the signature of the function f is exactly same in both classes, that means it isn't overloading; the derived class basically overrides the base class definition of f().


Virtual keyword allows you to override functions not overload them.

Also, the virtual attribute is inherited so virtual keyword is optional for f() in class B.


When you declare a function virtual what you are really saying to the compiler is that you want this function to behave in a polymorphic manner. That is, from your example if we have the following:

A* foo = new B();
foo->f();

it will call B's "f" function and not A's "f" function. To take it further, if we have a C which inherits from B like you've said:

class C : public B{}

B* foo = new C();
foo->f():

this calls B's "f". If you had defined it within C, it would have called C's method.

To explain the different behavior between virtual and non-virtual let's take this example:

struct Foo{
    virtual void f();
    void g();
};

struct Bar{
    virtual void f();
    void g();
};

Foo* var = new Bar();
var->f(); //calls Bar's f
var->g(); //calls Foo's g, it's not virtual

make sense?


Since A::f is virtual, and B::f has the same signature, it is said that B::f overrides A::f.

Which means:

A * p = new B;
p->f(); // invokes B::f

EDIT: The following is just plain wrong (see the comments):

Since B::f is also virtual, then it would be possible for a child class of B to override it again. If B:f wasn't virtual, than any method with the same signature in a child class would simply shadow it (that is, it would be a different method).

So, the behaviors depends on the parent.

0

上一篇:

下一篇:

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

最新问答

问答排行榜