QList children - struct or custom classes derived from QObject?
I'm currently working on Qt application on Symbian platform. Applicat开发者_如何学Goion has an sqlite database and initial data is populated from txt files.
I'm implementing online update from data that comes in json format. So i would like to create generic functions in my db update class that takes QList
of classes/structs and updated db from them. QList
would be populated with objects either from txt, or json.
I already have the parsing in place, just considering what would be better in terms for performance:
- Creating c++ structs and passing them (as objects hold only simple data) wrapped in
QList
- Creating custom classes derived from
QObject
and passing them as pointers inQList
and then deleting everything withqDeleteAll
- Any other way...
That depends on whether your classes are carrying behaviour or only state.
They carry behaviour.
Then, a polymorphic class is in order, yes. Whether it needs to inherit from
QObject
is another question. Inherit fromQObject
only if you need its services (introspection, signals/slots, event handling). Otherwise, don't.As for
qDeleteAll()
: I wouldn't go there. Instead of naked pointers, use smart pointers, e.g.QSharedPointer
. They keep track of the number of references to their payload, deleting it when the refcount falls to zero.In this case, don't use
QList
, but a more efficient container such asQVector
.They carry only state.
Then, a "dumb"
struct
may suffice. In this case, don't useQList
as a container, but something more efficient, likeQVector
(don't forget to make good use of thereserve()
method).
In general, try to avoid QList<T>
for types T
where sizeof(T)>sizeof(void*)
and non-buildin/non-Qt-types, because QList
performance is degraded for these.
精彩评论