ASP.NET MVC: Partial view to show part of a table

I have two views that render a table on each. Most of the tables are shared between both views so I want to be able to reuse the view code for them both.

Table 1

Column A   |   Column B
1          |   2
4          |   8

Table 2

Column A   |   Column B   |   Column C
1          |   2          |   7
4          |   8          |   2

Obviously, my actua开发者_StackOverflow中文版l tables are a lot more complicated than the example above, which only serves to compound the problem. Because of how tables are written in HTML, there seems to me no good way to cut out the stuff I want to reuse while still having the ability to add to it.

Using tables, are there any methods I can employ to reuse the code or will I have to move away from using tables?

Why not just create a view that specializes in building a table given a specific model that includes all the column and row information? That way, you can use the view anywhere you want, and the model you give it will determine how many columns and rows there are.

Edit

I don't think you're quite understanding my point, so I'll use some code. Right now you probably have a model that looks something like this:

public class Something
{
    public string ValueA {get;set;}
    public string ValueB {get;set;}
    public string ValueC {get;set;}
}

And your view probably looks something like this:

<table><tr><th>Column A</th><th>Column B</th><th>Column C</th></tr>
    <%foreach(var something in Model.Somethings) {%>
       <tr>
           <td><%:something.ValueA%></td>
           <td><%:something.ValueB%></td>
           <td><%:something.ValueA%></td>
       </tr>
    <%}%>
</table>

Well, as you have noticed, this doesn't lend itself well to simply columns from the table. One solution would be to set some options on the module to determine which columns get included, and then throw a bunch of if/then statements into your view. But I think a better solution would be to make a new Model class that looks more like this:

public class TableModel
{
    public IEnumerable<string> Headers {get;set;}
    public IEnumerable<IEnumerable<string>> Rows {get;set;}
}

Then your model looks more like this:

<table><tr>
    <%foreach(var header in Model.Headers) {%>
        <th><%:header%></th>
    <%}%></tr>
    <%foreach(var row in Model.Rows) {%>
       <tr>
       <%foreach(var cell in row) {%>
           <td><%:cell%></td>
        <%}%>
       </tr>
    <%}%>
</table>

As you can see, there is nothing in this view code that ties itself explicitly to your original data type, so it can be reused for any table you want to create throughout your entire application. Your controller becomes responsible for creating a TableModel object from the data that you want to represent. If a particular column gets included in that model, it will be displayed. If not, it won't.

Obviously, like your example, this is extremely simplified, but it should give you the general idea. The DataTable class, which is already part of .NET, might already have everything you need, so you won't even have to create your own TableModel class. It's already got some nice functionality around adding and removing columns, rows, etc.

I would suggest creating a HTMLHelper for the common code. I would pass the condition to the helper to determine what to output.

Try thinking of the problem in two steps. One is generating the headers and grabbing the columns that you need, another is actually rendering the Html. Then you can call a method like

RenderTable( string[] columnsINeed )

Which will render the table columns you need.

The way you need to render HTML shouldn't prevent you from writing re-usable code.